It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Animals are not falling to the wasteside from sickness and disease. Now if the bushman were, I would totally understand.
And that addresses the points I made how?
Your the only person I have found that doesn't agree that humans have way more sickeness, disease, and prevention than any other species on earth.
Not only is your answer garbled it does not again address the points I made
Even better show me where it says they have more sickness than us.
Not only is your answer garbled it does not again address the points I made
And you honestly think that they compete in frequencey of sickness with humans?
Seeing as though there are many more plants than humans and seeing as though the examples given result in death yes I do. Show me I am wrong.
Oh those few you offered, pfft, I seen the doctor just last year alone for more problems than that, and I'm only one person.
Not only have you not addressed the point I made. Made no comment on the examples I gave with a supporting link. You have not acknowledged plant vaccines that you thought was so laughable.
So I challenge you to try again and this time address the points I made.
Aagenaes syndrome
Aarskog Ose Pande syndrome
Aarskog syndrome
Aase Smith syndrome
Aase syndrome
ABCD syndrome
Abasia
Even if you do not accept that birds evolved from dinosaurs, unless you are now saying the chicken was around at the same time as them (dinosaurs) the egg still came before the chicken.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by colin42
It's not possible. There is no proof that dinosaurs and birds are related, and if anyone says differently I would highly question that, unless it comes from someone that believes in evolutionism, then I would laugh.Bah Ha Ha.
It means exactly what I wrote. Again I challenge you to address the points I made.
Again that addresses my point how? Try again
Animals are not falling to the wasteside from sickness and disease. Now if the bushman were, I would totally understand.
As I have told you before, you need to get out and meet more people. Now again address the point I made in my original post.
Your the only person I have found that doesn't agree that humans have way more sickeness, disease, and prevention than any other species on earth.
The way this works is you are meant to answer questions/respond to points made not ignore them and ask another question. Again address the original post.
Even better show me where it says they have more sickness than us.
Show that plants do not suffer sickness as much if not more than humans. You maintained they did not suffer any and had no need for vaccines. It would be really stupid to try to list all of them in a post. I gave you a sample of just a few.
Oh those few you offered, pfft, I seen the doctor just last year alone for more problems than that, and I'm only one person.
If there are more trees than people, then they should get more sickenss but they don't. The fact is, in comparison, then never get sick. We get all sorts of sickness,
As I said I am not that dim witted that I would supply a list on this forum like that. Copying and pasting a long list like that is probably a T&C violation anyway.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by colin42
Now that was a short list, but only the A's.
So I hope you are able to produce something that shows how much sickness plants and animals have by comparison LOL.
True but there always had to be a chicken to lay the egg.
Even if you do not accept that birds evolved from dinosaurs, unless you are now saying the chicken was around at the same time as them (dinosaurs) the egg still came before the chicken.
Your going to have to reword it because it made no sense to me. MIght be your accent.
So again for the second time I challenge you to address my original post with a bit more than 'it is not possible'. Failure to do so proves your total dishonesty in this thread.
And that is your logicall reply. What part of logic do you need explaining? What am I saying. A reply like that means you have no understanding of logic at all.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by colin42
To address your earlier point about the chicken, how he came into existance, I first have to answer that he might not be from here.
According to the bible we were given several things to help us, and he might be one such thing. Noahs arc did carry a lot of animals. What seemed to be salvation from a flood could have been interstellar transportation. I have no specific reason to believe that, its just a possibility.
So this is how he could have come into existance here.
It is only YOUR logic that I seem to be having a problem with.
And that is your logicall reply. What part of logic do you need explaining? What am I saying. A reply like that means you have no understanding of logic at all.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by colin42
It is only YOUR logic that I seem to be having a problem with.
And that is your logicall reply. What part of logic do you need explaining? What am I saying. A reply like that means you have no understanding of logic at all.
Renowned paleontologist Jack Horner has spent his career trying to reconstruct a dinosaur. He's found fossils with extraordinarily well-preserved blood vessels and soft tissues, but never intact DNA. So, in a new approach, he's taking living descendants of the dinosaur (chickens) and genetically engineering them to reactivate ancestral traits — including teeth, tails, and even hands — to make a "Chickenosaurus".
Cool, thank you for yours.
FYI- Don't bother answering my post I will not entertain your rubbish, lies and or spam trolling.
I have no way of knowing which ones and how far back. Perhaps if you resend them and number them, they wont slip past me.
So for the final time. Please address the posts I made not the meaningless replies you gave if you wish my conversation with you to continue.
well I never denied that they get a few of the same things we do, I'm sure its more than this, but couldn't be 1/2/3%
1. Aagenaes syndrome ...... occurs in humid tropical areas of the Americas, Africa, and Asia, and attacks chimpanzees and other primates as well as humans. ...
2. Aarskog Ose Pande syndrome .... it was also found in five species of non human primate: Chimpanzee (Pan ... Aagenaes Syndrome · Aarskog Ose Pande syndrome
3. a repeat