I hate to be the skeptic here again..but there are a few issues with this whole concept of HUGE underground cities populated with 10's of thousands
of people sitting below us. I have no problem with the idea of very extensive underground Government facilities and bases. Cheyenne Mountain is a
little hard to debunk, and that was OLD technology which created it, for instance. There is even a picture
here of what an Air Force machine looked like in the early 80's out at the Nevada Test Site.
There are a couple questions though.....
I'll pass entirely on how 60,000 people died without a single public voice being raised. Others have more than covered that..but what about the
'blasts'? As I understand it, nuclear detonations are not vague or hard to identify on a siesmic reading.
This article would seem to cover the details of how that works.
Perhaps a Neutron weapon then? Well, I seem to recall reading that Neturon weapons make a very small blast. Certainly no Earthquake. It would defeat
the whole purpose for why that weapons class came into being.
The
Encyclopedia confirmed what I'd thought about how they work in blast effect...or lack of it.
So how could these enormous city-bases have been destroyed below our feet and not leave a signature that scientists or these days, internet educated
laymen, could read and immediately see for what it was? The theory is really interesting, but I fail to see how it can translate into being an event
in the real world as it's said to have happened?