N91S (Angel FIre) and Lawrence Livermore Labs, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times
Topic started on 20-9-2011 @ 05:31 PM by gariac
N91S, a plane with callsign Angel Fire, first came to my knowledge from a spotter at Nellis AFB. It is Beechcraft with a serious amount of surveillance gear aboard. It flew the Nellis range, but where exactly, isn't public knowledge.

The FAA registration documents for N91S are on this website:
www.inplanesight.org...

The plane is operated by Dynamic Aviation, a well connected government contractor. Their services range include fire fighting, bug spraying, and snooping.
www.dynamicaviation.com...

N91S recently showed up on internet tracking, landing at Livermore (KLVK) airport.
flightaware.com...

It hasn't been tracked on the internet lately since it has been flying by visual flight rules rather than instrument flight rules (VFR vs IFR).

This document from Livermore indicates that LLNL (Lawrence LIvermore National Labs) has been writing software for use with Angel Fire and Constant Hawk.


“People in the department of defense got excited because they realized they could use the same techniques to look for terrorist activities,” says Duchaineau. In 2005, the video-camera effort that began with Sonoma was passed to the Department of Defense, which developed Angel Fire for the Air Force and Marine Corps and Constant Hawk for the Army.


str.llnl.gov...

As an aside, I thought "Constant XXX" is for USAF projects, so this document might have a bug or two in it.

The Angel Fire plane has been detected flying the general area around Livermore, and making numerous passes over the lab itself. Hey, might as well study someplace that you can access. Unknown to me is if they have placed any photo targets on the ground for Angel Fire to shoot, or if this is just a simple surveillance exercise to get data to fine tune their software. Surveillance tends to be at 10kft.

In any instrument design and associated software, you need to establish a baseline using known targets. That is, you do the remote sensing, but verify with on the ground measurements. Compare the remote data to the on-site data, and tweak the instrument and/or software for better resolution, or at least determine the capabilities of the gear.


reply posted on 20-9-2011 @ 05:34 PM by QuantumPhysicist
reply to post by gariac



I live in Dublin, the city next to livermore. Perhaps I'll go over there and check it out.
I drive by the Livermore Labs all the time.
Sounds pretty cool


reply posted on 20-9-2011 @ 10:47 PM by gariac
Here is a photo of the Sonoma sensor.



And a brief explanation of how it works:
www.llnl.gov...

Regarding spotting the plane, it appears to like to sleep-in, so you might catch it on the ground in the morning. I don't recall how easy or difficult it is to physically montior KLVK. Airports security, even for general aviation, is tight these days.

Most landings are after 4PM.

This is the flight schedule as I have detected it, but I don't have a clear view of the airport.

First Last
2011-09-20 16:14:21 2011-09-20 17:55:01
2011-09-19 14:27:37 2011-09-19 18:02:05
2011-09-16 18:09:38 2011-09-16 19:01:29
2011-09-15 16:21:17 2011-09-15 18:02:59
2011-09-14 13:38:26 2011-09-14 17:51:03
2011-09-08 17:31:58 2011-09-08 18:56:59
2011-09-07 11:50:39 2011-09-07 16:42:46
2011-09-06 15:29:45 2011-09-06 17:06:28
2011-09-02 12:02:54 2011-09-02 13:45:48



reply posted on 21-9-2011 @ 02:22 AM by gariac
Another Sonoma document, with more detail regarding how they connect all the cameras together.
e-reports-ext.llnl.gov...

Apparently a few of these DoD projects are using technology to stitch together cameras to make one large sensor. Without DSP, this would be difficult. The idea here is the smaller sensors are cheaper than one big sensor. It has to do with semiconductor yield. Also the smaller lens are cheaper to manufacture. Basically everything it commercial off the shelf (COTS).


reply posted on 26-9-2011 @ 09:23 PM by TAGBOARD
I hope this article helps shed light on Angel Fire:

First USAF Blue Devil Flies Combat Sortie

I believe Dynamic Aviation is a subcontractor to SAIC on this program. Perhaps a Big Safari effort.


reply posted on 27-9-2011 @ 01:20 AM by gariac
reply to post by TAGBOARD



The link was useful. Of course googling Blue Devil mostly fired up the old Google echo chamber. There are a few documents on .mil domains, with this being the most interesting.

www.js.pentagon.mil...

While the USAF likes airships for surveillance, there seems to be a lot of aggravation in supplying them helium.
www.wired.com...

Also the only report I read of Gorgon Stare was that it was a failure.
articles.latimes.com...
www.wired.com...

Not mentioned in these articles is the bandwidth issue. More data...more bandwidth. However, spectrum is finite.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Interesting Places- Interesting Bases-
  Posted 4 days ago with 8 member flags
\'Inside Pine Gap: The Spy Who Came in From The Desert\' Book
  Posted 8 days ago with 5 member flags
Lockheed out at the TTR?
  Posted 6 days ago with 2 member flags
YF-16 tested at a "secret base near Nellis"
  Posted 5 days ago with 2 member flags