It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Breitbart: Conservatives ‘outnumber’ liberals, ‘and we have the guns’

page: 6
15
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 05:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by narwahl

Originally posted by Alxandro
He is right.

As long as he didn't make any specific references to killing a particular person, like Libs do on a regular basis via Facebook, YouTube, twitter, it's perfectly safe and legit.


Got anything more concrete than this guy

Originally posted by wasco2
Actually I would love for the looney left to grab there golf clubs and baseball bats and take to the streets. If enough of them do it to make a major nuisance, or maybe even a threat, maybe the Silent Majority will wake up and realize the biggest threat to America is from within. The looney left may then find out to most on the right gun control means being able to hit your target. And guns kill from a lot farther away than rocks and molotov cocktails.

?


Yep, be careful what you wish for.





posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 05:41 PM
link   
reply to post by narwahl
 


In America it is a law that hospital emergency rooms can't turn down patients who have no insurance. From what I understand, the ER's aren't mandated to do more than to stabilize the patient. They send the patient to the proper medical offices or hospitals who can further treat the patient.
The low income or no income patients qualify for health care and are directed accordingly.

Dr. Ron Paul doesn't want anyone to die from a lack of proper insurance. Neither do the Tea Party members in the crowd.
If the Republicans dominated the offices, Rep. Paul Ryans plan would most likely be the route taken to help the people when choosing an insurance provider. It's a plan that Congress already partakes in.
The problem here is that the liberals are the one's with their fingers in their ears, lol. They probably haven't taken out any time to hear what Paul Ryan is proposing.

The liberals are masters at name calling and at killing a person's or group's reputation or idea's. They throw their vile around like bullies and they are by far the loudest attention grabbers around.
So they spew hate all day long until they think no one will bother to do the research.

Andrew Breitbart is a recovering liberal, lol.
He knows the way the radical lib's think and they have been exposed in lie after lie after lie bc of Breitbart.

He knew he would be a target and he is.
I remember seeing dozens of truly hateful tweets directed towards him. The extreme name calling and threats. I wondered how this would affect him.



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 05:51 PM
link   
reply to post by Alxandro
 


No, sorry.... doesn't cut it.
Tweeting "Die you bastard" is nowhere near openly hoping for violence that that posting conveyed.



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 06:00 PM
link   
reply to post by narwahl
 



reply to post by neo96


Barbarians....
Markus Bachmann?


Barbarians....

Joe Biden?




posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 06:02 PM
link   
this is a losing arguement

what party were john willks booth,john hinkley jr,, lee harvey oswald and jarod loughner from?

to name a few the right may have guns history shows who uses them
edit on 20-9-2011 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 06:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by sweetliberty
 


RP's initial response was "no" before he was shouted down by the "yeah" screams from some TP viewers. Not even talking about the politician's views here, it's the people screaming "yeah" to the question if they should let someone die who disgust me.


The Republican Presidential candidates aren't well known for being blunt and to the point. They are easily persuaded and to be frank, many Republicans are weak and can be easily bought. It doesn't (didn't) take much to spook them, lol. (in the recent past, now there are younger, fresher Rep's)

When Dr. Ron Paul was blunt and ready to dig into the question given to him by the moderator, the TP cheered him on.
To date, the Rep. candidates have been played as fools by the moderators. The Tea Partiers in the crowd aren't the rino Republicans of old. They are a mixture of Americans who use to have a life without such government intrusion on their privacy.

While they are "members" of something called The Tea Party, they are not owned by that label. They are individuals and are respected as such. The Tea Party doesn't want to be up their rears any more than the people want to be labeled.
The group is only a group that respects individualism, self reliance, fairness, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

The hoots from the crowd are people who will defend the Constitution, America and what it has stood for.
They are peaceful no nonsense Americans who got along before the great divider Obama was elected in the W.H. and they will be peaceful no nonsense Americans after this one-term community organizer is out.









edit on 20-9-2011 by sweetliberty because: to finish a sentence



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 06:10 PM
link   
reply to post by whaaa
 

Violence is NOT the answer; defending democracy for ALL__not just the rich. And Breitbart better know that it's not just the 'baggers that know how to shoot. What a failed attempt at leading. He's a baiter and pathetic at that.



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 06:37 PM
link   
reply to post by JIMC5499
 


So you've never commented in a thread about another country on ATS?

By the way, ATS stands for Above Top Secret, not America Top Secret, and as long as I stay within the rules the board has, I can post where I please on these forums.


Couple more things, I'm Canadian



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 06:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by narwahl
reply to post by Alxandro
 


No, sorry.... doesn't cut it.
Tweeting "Die you bastard" is nowhere near openly hoping for violence that that posting conveyed.


Selectivity at it's best.
Guns is not a bad word, yet bastard is.

Interesting how you conveniently reference the most tamest tweet from a vile assortment of left wing hate.



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 06:45 PM
link   
Why don't you divide America in two parts, instead of killing each other? say, the West Coast up to and including Kansas will be the Republican United States, and the rest up to the East Coast will be the Democrats United States. Let's see then who does better.



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 06:48 PM
link   
reply to post by masterp
 


already have that just look at new york and california

shining pillars of liberalism in america and the most violent



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 06:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by whaaa
www.rawstory.com...
I also wonder how many of the ATS conservatives agree with him and Michael Savage that also thinks violence is an answer.

Interesting.

Your article is dated: Sept. 19, 2011.

Look at what article is dated: Sept. 5, 2011.

Link: Hoffa Threatens GOP At Obama Event: "Take These Son Of Bitches Out"
Dated: September 5, 2011


Teamsters President Jimmy Hoffa had some profane, combative words for Republicans while warming up the crowd for President Obama in Detroit, Michigan on Monday.

"We got to keep an eye on the battle that we face: The war on workers. And you see it everywhere, it is the Tea Party. And you know, there is only one way to beat and win that war. The one thing about working people is we like a good fight. And you know what? They've got a war, they got a war with us and there's only going to be one winner. It's going to be the workers of Michigan, and America. We're going to win that war," Jimmy Hoffa said to a heavily union crowd.

"President Obama, this is your army. We are ready to march. Let's take these son of bitches out and give America back to an America where we belong," Hoffa added.

What comes around goes around.

edit on 9/20/2011 by Section31 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 06:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by masterp
Why don't you divide America in two parts, instead of killing each other? say, the West Coast up to and including Kansas will be the Republican United States, and the rest up to the East Coast will be the Democrats United States. Let's see then who does better.


Consistently, Democratic-voting states contribute more to the US Treasury relative to outlays than Republican-voting states.



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 06:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by illuminatislave

Originally posted by Gannicus

Originally posted by illuminatislave

The same conservatives that scream "let him die" when talking about uninsured Americans?



That never happened.


In your own mind, perhaps. Take those fingers out of your ears my friend and open your eyes, you have nutcases running around that would prefer that people die instead of receiving healthcare.



That is just your interpretation of it. It is much easier to say that than to realize that there will always be poor among us no matter how much we do for them. The deal with liberals is that they buy into the socialist utopia idea that one can "soak the rich" to pay for the poor. This is spiritually and economically bankrupt. When the govt can arbitrarily take up to 50 per cent of your hard earned paycheck for bureaucratic goals and agendas is when the individual rights are abused.
Since the WH occupier was elected, we hear nothing but this bankrupt rhetoric of how the rich need to pay their fair share. This is nothing but class warfare. Buffett has to be the classic Daddy Warbucks who is rolling in cash and doesnt even pay his own taxes but tells us the govt should be allowed to collect more from the rest of us. It is always the middle class who hurts the most.



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 06:59 PM
link   
You guys are falling for their divide and conquer strategy, hook line and sinker.



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 07:09 PM
link   
Deadman's Advocate
As someone who is an undeclared voter, I have absolutely no problem with a little chaos. If it will take the fires of hell to break up the polarization of ideologies, let the dogs of war loose to determine our fates. After the war comes to an end, we should ban all political loyalists. Anyone who declares themselves as a loyalists to 'any political party' should be arrested for treason. Citizens should only be loyal to the United States, and they should not be loyal toward political parties, bankers, unions, corporations, and media outlets.

It could be fun.



edit on 9/20/2011 by Section31 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 07:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ghost375
You guys are falling for their divide and conquer strategy, hook line and sinker.




Glad to see at least one person here gets it. All this partisan crap is just to keep you distracted and fighting each other instead of going after the real problems.

I have a Union ticket and I have firearms, I wonder where some of you would place me in this schoolyard scuffle. Hopefully the more enlightened would place me as an individual. The less enlightened might try to paint me left or right so that they can burn me in effigy.

Zealotry has no place in the land of the free no matter what you claim to believe.
edit on 20-9-2011 by SanguineDenial because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 07:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by masterp
 


already have that just look at new york and california

shining pillars of liberalism in america and the most violent


No, I mean officially: two federal government, two countries, two flags.



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 07:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by Section31
Deadman's Advocate
As someone who is an undeclared voter, I have absolutely no problem with a little chaos. If it will take the fires of hell to break up the polarization of ideologies, let the dogs of war loose to determine our fates. After the war comes to an end, we should ban all political loyalists. Anyone who declares themselves a loyalists to 'any political party' should be arrested for treason. Loyalties should be towards the United States, and they should not be toward political parties, bankers, corporations, and media outlets.

It could be fun.

Uh-huh?


"Won't Get Fooled Again"
We'll be fighting in the streets
With our children at our feet
And the morals that they worship will be gone
And the men who spurred us on
Sit in judgment of all wrong
They decide and the shotgun sings the song

I'll tip my hat to the new constitution
Take a bow for the new revolution
Smile and grin at the change all around me
Pick up my guitar and play
Just like yesterday
And I'll get on my knees and pray
We don't get fooled again Don't get fooled again

Change it had to come
We knew it all along
We were liberated from the fall that's all
But the world looks just the same
And history ain't changed '
Cause the banners, they all flown in the last war

I'll tip my hat to the new constitution
Take a bow for the new revolution
Smile and grin at the change all around me
Pick up my guitar and play
Just like yesterday
And I'll get on my knees and pray
We don't get fooled again

Don't get fooled again No, no!
I'll move myself and my family aside
If we happen to be left half alive
I'll get all my papers and smile at the sky
For I know that the hypnotized never lie
Do ya?

There's nothing in the street
Looks any different to me
And the slogans are replaced, by-the-bye
And the parting on the left Is now the parting on the right
And the beards have all grown longer overnight
I'll tip my hat to the new constitution
Take a bow for the new revolution
Smile and grin at the change all around me
Pick up my guitar and play
Just like yesterday
Then I'll get on my knees and pray
We don't get fooled again
Don't get fooled again No, no!

YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!

Meet the new boss
Same as the old boss


Well Peter had it right, didn't he?
edit on 20-9-2011 by JohnnyCanuck because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 07:26 PM
link   
Didn't John Titor predict a US civil war?



new topics

top topics



 
15
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join