CBS Reporter Suggests Use of Explosives On 9/11 New Ground Z Video must SEE!, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times
Topic started on 20-9-2011 @ 05:14 AM by hotbread

www.youtube.com...

youtu.be...
I apologize if this has been posted somewhere, I'm not a demolition expert here but the above video may very well be used as part of some proof that the towers fell due to an explosion unrelated to the hijacked planes that hit it.
The video was taken just before the tower collapsed, the camera man zooms in on the lower floors that are still burning and you can clearly see the burnt cars and debris at ground zero.

Skip to about 5:00 to hear the reporter, remember it's CBS that said it.


Here is another video that could help solve this puzzle.



edit on 20-9-2011 by hotbread because: utube link



reply posted on 20-9-2011 @ 05:23 AM by LightAssassin
reply to post by DemonicUFO


Haha. What if they were put there when they were built?!? What company built the Towers?
edit on 20-9-2011 by LightAssassin because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 20-9-2011 @ 05:26 AM by DemonicUFO
reply to post by LightAssassin


I found this though
WTC withstand plane impacts
edit on 20-9-2011 by DemonicUFO because: (no reason given)


Found the video
edit on 20-9-2011 by DemonicUFO because: (no reason given)
edit on 20-9-2011 by DemonicUFO because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 20-9-2011 @ 06:13 AM by Venomilk
reply to post by SphinxMontreal


you didnt watch the part of the video where he clarifies he didnt know what the building was at the time, did you? thats one of the main reasons they were so intent on the cars. the building was kind of a focus, but not major. estimating 30 stories on a 45 story building is kinda close, so id cut the reporter a bit of slack. he still had brass balls to be there, but i dont think he even thought it would collapse. i could be wrong, and he may have thought it possible (right before deciding to book it to safety)


reply posted on 20-9-2011 @ 07:24 AM by marvinthemartian
reply to post by hotbread


Can you send this post to the owners of liverpool fc as they are investigating one of their players for tweeting that sept 11 wasnt terrorists,


reply posted on 20-9-2011 @ 07:58 AM by samkent
reply to post by DemonicUFO




Explosives is what brought the wtc buildings down. there were bombs preplanted inside the buildings. the question everyone is trying to figure out is who exactly put them there.


Wrong on two counts.

Explosives were not what brought the buildings down and almost no one is trying to find out who put them there.

Welcome to the boards. It may take you a while to get up to speed on the real facts.


reply posted on 21-9-2011 @ 06:58 AM by thedman
reply to post by pryingopen3rdeye


Guess you never seen a real car fire....?

Everything you said is wrong

As someone who has been a member of Fire Department for 25 years seen enough car fires

Most car today are built mostly of plastic - which burns. Non structural members are either plastic or white
metal which has a low melting point or burn

Gas tanks typically do not burn unless damaged in some way - not like Hollywood

Many parts in engine compartment are plastic/rubber - hence burn , Radiators fins are often aluminium which
melt in fire

Only rhing left after a car fire is metal shell


reply posted on 21-9-2011 @ 09:03 AM by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by hotbread
I apologize if this has been posted somewhere, I'm not a demolition expert here but the above video may very well be used as part of some proof that the towers fell due to an explosion unrelated to the hijacked planes that hit it.


Yes, it's been posted before, many, many times, although in different guises, and I'm sure this will be posted many, many times again in different guises for the simple reason that the conspiracy people want the idea of "secretly planted explosives brought down the towers" to be true so they're repeat these videos as nauseum in the hopes of finding that magic number of iterations that spontaneously makes a falsehood into the truth.

The answer is always going to be the same: flight AA175 hit the south tower literally one floor above a very large mechanical floor dedicated to housing all the electrical transformers, electrical motors, electrical generators, pressurized pipes, etc that make a building function, and they're all things that will go BOOM when on fire.

List of occupants in the south tower by floor

The plane dumped thousands of gallons of burning aviation fuel directly into this floor so of course there will be explosions, and we know this is what the explosions were because the explosions were randomly going off as the fires reached each flammable object in turn, rather than synchronized as demolitions always are. If even ONE explosion we heard was from one of the flammable objects that were documented to have been in the building, then we necessarily need to acknowledge that ALL the explosions we heard were from flammable objects that were documented to have been in the building.

There are plenty of reasonable explanations for what we saw that day. The problem is that these damned fool conspiracy websites forbid you from knowing what they are so they can get you to believe in the goofy explanations. Of COURSE people are going to believe there were bombs in the building when we have snake oil peddlers like Richard Gage getting people to swallow the nonsense that the towers were really just empty cardboard boxes.


reply posted on 21-9-2011 @ 04:38 PM by hotbread
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by hotbread
I apologize if this has been posted somewhere, I'm not a demolition expert here but the above video may very well be used as part of some proof that the towers fell due to an explosion unrelated to the hijacked planes that hit it.




The answer is always going to be the same: flight AA175 hit the south tower literally one floor above a very large mechanical floor dedicated to housing all the electrical transformers, electrical motors, electrical generators, pressurized pipes, etc that make a building function, and they're all things that will go BOOM when on fire.

List of occupants in the south tower by floor

The plane dumped thousands of gallons of burning aviation fuel directly into this floor so of course there will be explosions, and we know this is what the explosions were because the explosions were randomly going off as the fires reached each flammable object in turn, rather than synchronized as demolitions always are. If even ONE explosion we heard was from one of the flammable objects that were documented to have been in the building, then we necessarily need to acknowledge that ALL the explosions we heard were from flammable objects that were documented to have been in the building.




Hello,
The building in the video is WTC 7, and the only raging fire I can see is coming from one floor.
I think the reporter goes into the building at 1:18 in the video and there is nothing burning on the ground floor. Yes, there were small explosions and intense fire coming from what appears to some highly flammable material but whether it was enough to collapse a building or not is what need to be investigated.


Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 12 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 4 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 14 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 8 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 16 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 18 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 8 days ago with 8 member flags