It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GrinchNoMore
reply to post by phantomjack
LOL pushed out by what, the cores that were falling first ?? The outer walls still have not moved at that point.
I guess all that concrete powder was like "Ink Toner" Yeah that must have totally fanned the flames... so much so it fanned invisible flames underneath as well.
Originally posted by nottheonlyone
So you believe there was a conspiracy in regards to WTC 7, but then that terrorists flew the planes into WTC 1 and 2. Instead of believing the whole thing was a conspiracy or believing the official story.
Hmmmmm..... Which one is a bigger stretch of the imagination? Which one is a more probable hypothesis of the 3 selections?edit on 20-9-2011 by nottheonlyone because: grammar
Originally posted by pteridine
Originally posted by MrWendal
Originally posted by wardk28
reply to post by MrWendal
Here is a question; how many controlled demolitions do you know of where the rubble burned for months afterwards? Controlled demolitions are used to remove old buildings and for the most part build a new one where the old ones stood. Builders don't want to wait months to start working on a new building for the fires to go out.
I agree..which now begs the question, why did the pile continue to burn for months? Jet fuel does not burn for months either.
Houston we have a problem.
Controlled demolition companies remove the contents of the building to be demolished. The towers had all of their content when they collapsed less what was expelled on impact.
The pile continued to burn because there was significant fuel in the rubble in the form of office furnishings and paper. In such an environment, they continued to burn as a damped fire while the rubble acted as insulation. Underground fires are common in the mining industry and are difficult to extinguish.
Originally posted by Viper73
Jeeeeez....this OP.........is another fool who hasnt got the strength or intelligence to escape his own cognitive dissonance........listen....we have gone over this for 10 years.....10 damn years........a friggin decade......if you still don't have enough friggin neurons in your puny little brain to know that 911 was an inside job, then there is no hope for your azz.....I'm not kidding either......so tired of paid posters coming on here attempting to smear the or cloudy viewers perceptions of something that has already been virtually proven. This debate is done....there is no controversy .....you either are smart,intuitive with common sense or your cognitive dissonance is ruling over you!
911 has and always will be an inside job! Wake the hell up! ...and if your a paid poster......get outta here!
Originally posted by XtraTL
Also, the logic that the building contained only paper, an aeroplane, jet fuel and steel is clearly nonsense.
edit on 20-9-2011 by XtraTL because: Corrected typos
Originally posted by SmokeandShadow
If a truther is defined by an absolute belief in the building demolition theory, I wouldn't fit it either, but I sure as hell don't buy the clean-as-a-whistle OS.