It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LUXUS
To be hot and stupid can be attractive, but to be ugly and stupid is unforgivable
The truth is that physical attraction can override many things, guys in general will be attracted to a stupid but pretty female because they know there is a higher chance of getting her into bed.
Females will be attracted to a dumb but hot guy because they believe he will be good in bed “cute” I think is the code word (which is why I snarl like a rabid dog at anyone who would dare call me cute, or adorable for that matter!)
And that’s about the truth of it for most people
Those who are very deep thinkers however will probably find dumb people repulsive to the point of not wanting to breath the same air
Originally posted by Calex1987
reply to post by ColCurious
lol your best bet would be to quote her on the...i can see Russia from Alaska....now that was just funny...
[color=CFECEC]"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that."
George Carlin
Basically, you are claiming that other people are stupid, solely because they did not use google to find the answer to your question, for you??
Originally posted by RadeonGFXRHumanGTXisAlien
I mean i ask people questions sometimes, and they say "never heard of it".....and they think they are "cool" for not knowing it. Now, this doesn't just come down to ignorance, since if [color=FFAD66]your ignorant, you can just look this info up on google....but they chose not to, therefore they are stupid.
Originally posted by RadeonGFXRHumanGTXisAlien
.........[color=FFAD66]your ignorant,....
Originally posted by sweetliberty
Originally posted by Calex1987
reply to post by ColCurious
lol your best bet would be to quote her on the...i can see Russia from Alaska....now that was just funny...
Palin never said that so there is no way to quote her. It was Saturday Night Live and others who followed SNL who took a quote from Palin and distorted it's content into a comedy skit, lol.edit on 20-9-2011 by sweetliberty because: (no reason given)
PALIN: They're our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.
Paradigm:
Originally posted by shimmeringsilver73
From Wikipedia:
The telltale sign of a pseudo intellectual is the superficial sprinkling and misuse of terms like "paradigm shift" and name dropping
And then there is this little gem found elsewhere:
Posseses a severe tendency to blindly and wholeheartedly believe any bull# they hear, only to subsequently regurgitate the misinformation to anyone they see in an asinine attempt to appear more intelligent than a used, broken condom.
Wiki The thing is that when post people talk about a paradigm shift, they mean "the philosophical or theoretical framework" for everyday folks has shifted. They don't mean the more specific usages of this word. So a lot of those cries of "it's misused!" are from a lack of recognizing that there's more than 1 use for the word. Also, when you talk about a physical object causing a paradigm shift, like cellphones and what it did for the values that people placed on communication, or even phones before that. (It's the whole: phones were adopted as a better means of communication than letters because of the nuances of hearing things like sarcasm. Cellphones are doing away with some of the intimacy of phone conversation with the expedience of texting, and as a result, people are winding up trying to decipher intent, thoughts, interest that used to take 2-3 pages of handwritten mess or even voice tone, to this 166 letter Frankenstein thought. There are consequences of the thinking it takes to adopt phones, then go to cellphones, and the thought processes driving distance communication has changed, for good or ill.) Think of how much we save in typing if we just say the Cellphone Paradigm Sift. Most people ought to be able to figure out what is being talked about--especially when they lived through it. I haven't seen a lot of misuse of this word, just an inability of either side being able to talk through the steps it takes to establish that a paradigm shift has occurred--or that they are even using the same definition for the word.
broadly: a philosophical or theoretical framework of any kind."[5]
Originally posted by RadeonGFXRHumanGTXisAlien
Judging from the posts, i've read on ATS and obviously my real life experiences.
Is being stupid and ignorant "attractive"?
I mean i ask people questions sometimes, and they say "never heard of it".....and they think they are "cool" for not knowing it.
Now, this doesn't just come down to ignorance, since if your ignorant, you can just look this info up on google....but they chose not to, therefore they are stupid.
Why does society, reward stupidity, such as sport athletes, celebrities,politics, moronic music, but seem to relegate intelligence?
And i'm not talking about scientists with degrees, since people would take them seriously, but still call them "point dexer" or something, people seem to relegate, smart people from the streets, and our places of residence.
You don't see people encouraging others to become intelligent, and this isn't a reference to our parents, since most of them would encourage us, since lets face it, we need to be social with our peers, and they just dont seem to encourage intelligence, but rather useless pursuits, like sports, and "bands", if you haven't noticed.
Are stupid people, the lowest common denominator?
edit on 20-9-2011 by RadeonGFXRHumanGTXisAlien because: (no reason given)
But if you don't admit to it being over your head, they can't prove their intent, can they? Some absolutely brilliant people out there cannot relate to those who aren't on the same level as them. But at the same time, if you never ask for clarification, then the stupidity is not on them. I swear a lot of my life is spent playing Captain Obvious just so people can catch up--that does not mean I get it on a level they can understand the first time I say it. It means I have to reiterate. Now, either I can get a big head about it, or I can just accept that they don't think the same way I do.
Originally posted by fooks
it is just being a pompous ass and talking over your head like many many do here. lol!!
Is being a devil's Advocate always wrong? I can think of plenty of times I've taken a stance in here that isn't my full belief because those who are posting the things I would post are not spelling out their rationalizations, and I'll continue to poke at them until they lay out a bit more information than " 'Cause I sed so!" They come across as not thinking before they made their conclusion, and that's not healthy.
throwing around poop they themselves don't even believe.
If you try to impress someone with dazzling wordplay, then yeah, there is a big problem. The thing is that a lot of people who use the big words do it because it's the best word to fit the subject at hand. For instance: Archetype--there is no single word in the English language that carries the same nuance that this one word does. Prototype comes pretty close, but it's still not enough. Other times it's because the writer is distracted and for the love of Rainbow Sprite, they cannot remember the simpler word, nor do they want to waste time to. Also, you wind up using big flowing paragraphs when you want others to be able to follow your line of thinking. Just saying there are real important reasons to be wordy.
trying to impress someone else with dazzling word play that doesn't go anywhere and
This one there's not a thing to argue with because you were concise enough.
for the win, someone that thinks they are better than another, based out of ignorance of the subject.
Their goal shouldn't be to impress you.
that crap does not impress me at all.
More accurate to state that most people don't want to struggle to understand you. If you want to understand, you'll ask questions or you'll look things up. Now, if you do this and the person is still being a Richard, then they are exactly what you are fussing about.
most people want to understand what you say.
No one is an idiot for not getting it right the first time.
you can't get your message across, then you are the idiot, no matter how large your vocabulary.
Hence my points towards laziness being far more dangerous than the big wordy mess of the "intellectual".
it is easier to play dumb than to play "intellectual".
i agree that this does happen. I know I've posted somewhere on ATS that you can BE RIGHT without BEING IN THE RIGHT.
Originally posted by Bluesma
I keep deleting myself as I get carried away in the complexities of that point of view! Suffice it to say, that taken to an extreme, valuation of the intellect and reason tends to dominate and overide, if not stunt development, of the emotional skills. This is what I observe in individuals.
Not that simple. Since we don't have the body language, people read every dissenting comment as a freaking argument. There's also enough studies (surveys, mostly) that show we tend to say things online that we wouldn't say to someone's face. This can be both good and bad. Also, they did a study that showed that even a cartoon face appearing to look at you where you can notice it will keep you from stealing...ie.e facial contact makes you more honest was the conclusion.
But we aren't that good at t, we haven't developed those skills, nor even a comprehensive understanding of what that means, and Facebook along with other web communications has been the first steps towards trying. They're safe because they avoid body language and emotional contagion which americans have no idea how to deal with.
Speaking as a woman who mentally runs circles around my husband, it has negative side effects to be seen as the "more intelligent" partner. As far as IQ is concerned, his score is not enough lower than mine to warrant me being touted as the "smarter partner". What I am is far quicker at processing. That is the only difference. When I'm right, he still hasn't made his decision yet. When I'm wrong, he often takes too long to point out where I went wrong. So I'm on the next subject, being wrong/in the wrong, firmly convicted of right, and he feels like an idiot before he gets to the point where he knows where I went off the deep end. It's frustrating for both of us--and there are times when I have to stroke his ego (generally reminding him of why he feels dumb when he is not), that I would not have to do if I was just as "slow-witted" or at least was incapable of reasoning as well as I do. the sad part is to most people, his pace of thinking is fine. The problem's with me.
But also I agree with the person who said men do find women more attractive when they seem a bit missing in the intelligence department, as it makes a nice nothingness there for them to speak out and feel intelligent in contrast. So acting a bit dumb on purpose to watch your man puff his chest out and act with confidence in public does happen.