It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

ufo being transported in las vegas (pictures)

page: 15
59
<< 12  13  14    16 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 11:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by Manhater
Just throwing it out there.




I was thinking of that exact same video! That came about, what, about a year ago? Whatever became of it (I never heard)?




posted on Sep, 21 2011 @ 12:09 AM
link   
reply to post by Iiquiringmind
 


Exactly my point they do do those things. They pass through my town all the time with wide loads and there are cops every single time. How I know this? I get caught behind them on my way to work alot of the time. It very anoying you know, driving at 40 KPH for 20 kilometers .



posted on Sep, 21 2011 @ 01:04 AM
link   
i would venture to guess that wherever the object is being transported to is only a short distance from wherever it came from.

otherwise it would seem more logical to put it on a train.

the logistics are far more complicated on the highway for such a load.

distance/location is the only factor i can think of that accounts for putting it on the highway instead of a train.

maybe it just came from a train? and is going from the depot to its destination?



posted on Sep, 21 2011 @ 01:59 AM
link   
Well, seeing as I was employed with the City when the project started, I've toured the site, seen the drill, seen 2 spare drill bits stacked up, wrapped exactly like you see on this flatbed, I'm 100% sure it IS a drill bit.

And no, this particular bit doesn't weigh "tons and tons". The entire drill itself weights 1500 tons, but the drill bit constitutes about 2% of that, roughly 3 tons, or to be more specific, 3200 pounds.

Trust me. It's a drill bit.



posted on Sep, 21 2011 @ 02:11 AM
link   
reply to post by Gando702
 


Well 2% of 1500 TONS is 60,000 lbs it is not as you


roughly 3 tons, or to be more specific, 3200 pounds.


Put down the beer your math is way off.



posted on Sep, 21 2011 @ 02:15 AM
link   
Gah, my math is way off. I meant 32 tons, or 64000 pounds. Still, I've seen the drill bits. There's always a possibility it's NOT, but I've seen those exact shapes, wrapped exactly that way. There's no other way for them to be delivered to the site than by a flatbed trailer.

I have my wife looking into it, as well. She might be able to get some pictures of them unwrapping and disassembling it. Like I said in my previous post that no one read, they have to be taken apart, and lowered into the shaft, and then reassembled for drilling.

Believe what you want, you kooks.



posted on Sep, 21 2011 @ 02:16 AM
link   
reply to post by Gando702
 


Im with I said it before it is industrial, heavy, and likely mining related.



posted on Sep, 21 2011 @ 02:19 AM
link   
The trailers that deliver the bits are designed to hold 80k pounds.

Seconded.



posted on Sep, 21 2011 @ 07:59 AM
link   
reply to post by ParanoidAmerican
 


Now I understand what you mean, but I only noticing now, while looking again at the truck, that it only has two axles at the end (and it looks like it has another two in front of the load), so it cannot be such a big truck as the ones you were talking about, right?



posted on Sep, 21 2011 @ 11:38 AM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 


The extra axle are out of the second pic you can only see the hydraulic arm down. Yes the one I showed has Trips (3 back axles + hydraulics) and the one from the OP is a Tandem (2 axles + hydraulics). I didn't think of this before really but you can not lower the back w/o having those wheels down, so if height is the issue that could be why they are down.



posted on Sep, 21 2011 @ 03:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by ParanoidAmerican
I didn't think of this before really but you can not lower the back w/o having those wheels down, so if height is the issue that could be why they are down.
Could you please rephrase that, I don't understand what you mean by that.


Thanks in advance.



posted on Sep, 21 2011 @ 04:26 PM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 


Ok a lowboy trailer's deck can be raised up or down for many reasons ( the clear a bridge or power lines, or just to lower the center of gravity) the back end can not be lowered if the extra axles are up like in the pic I linked, but if they are down like the OP's the deck can be lowered. Does that help? Video This trailer is almost like it.


edit on 21-9-2011 by ParanoidAmerican because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 21 2011 @ 05:41 PM
link   
reply to post by ParanoidAmerican
 


Now I understand it, thanks.



posted on Sep, 21 2011 @ 06:07 PM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 


Ya no problem the OP's trailer has open wheels in back allowing for greater travel control.



posted on Sep, 21 2011 @ 06:09 PM
link   
@ Armap and Paranoid American.
It's not a very heavy load, if it were the trailer would topple. I'm a former truck-driver. I worked at a junkyard and part of the job was bringing stripped cars to a company that would shredder them. I had to load 3 cars on top of each other which is equivalent to 3 metric tons. We used a bulldozer too crush the roofs (great stuff to do and has learned me to stay far away from certain cars, especially Italian and French) and had to place them carefully on top of each other and make sure they wouldn't hang over too much to one side because the truck would also hang too much over. That's 3 metric tons and 10 feet in height.

No way this is a drill-head. It can't be a heavy load. Maybe it's a satellite dish. it could also be a prop for some movie or promotion because it really looks like a UFO based on Bob Lazar's testimony.



posted on Sep, 21 2011 @ 06:15 PM
link   
reply to post by Regenstorm
 


I do this for a living as well I load and unload excavators Cat 330's (77,400lbs) and bigger from the side w/o disconnecting and have never had one tip. The center of gravity is to low.


edit on 21-9-2011 by ParanoidAmerican because: (no reason given)

Video This is not me and they have lowered the trailer. I do it have done it w/o lowering it.
edit on 21-9-2011 by ParanoidAmerican because: (no reason given)


AT: Now I have stated also that it could be lighter and the back axle's are down b/c they need extra clearance ahead.
edit on 21-9-2011 by ParanoidAmerican because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 22 2011 @ 09:36 PM
link   
Yeah right. Why would the powers that be risk transporting highly advanced technology along a well traveled highway in a major U.S. city? What happens if they get in a car crash and everyone sees whats under the tarp? Do they say its just a model for a UFO Convention? Come on and have common sense. The CIA transported high value targets to foreign countries through the use of small and little known airports with private planes. I doubt that anyone in charge of moving a crashed UFO would just put it on a truck and haul it cross-country.



posted on Sep, 22 2011 @ 09:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by ParanoidAmerican
AT: Now I have stated also that it could be lighter and the back axle's are down b/c they need extra clearance ahead.
Now after all that stomping, you've changed your mind?
Now, even with changing your mind, do you still state no that cannot be a satellite dish?



posted on Sep, 22 2011 @ 10:49 PM
link   
reply to post by CynicalDrivel
 

At first glance I though damn this is heavy but after looking at the trailer closer, it could be lighter because there is no decking over the rear wheels, I assumed (and we know what that means) the extra rears were down for weight. But b/c there is no decking it gives that trailer greater travel room than the one I showed. I still think it is most likely heavy and mining b/c there is still room to drop it. I could tell you more if I could see the extra axles and if I knew the height of it. It looks that it was too tall to haul up-right or they would have. I think if it was a dish they would have used a other means this seems inefficient.



posted on Sep, 23 2011 @ 03:02 AM
link   
could it be the circular piece to this?





new topics

top topics



 
59
<< 12  13  14    16 >>

log in

join