It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Haxsaw
Yeah, the official story is pretty lame to say the least if you ask me, would be nice to see a real investigation done.
Originally posted by Haxsaw
Originally posted by FurvusRexCaeli
The intelligence community is tasked with discovering adversary intentions and capabilities, not placing security cameras all over office buildings for the unlikely event that someone might drive an airplane into them.
You are joking right?
the cameras wouldnt just be there waiting for a plane to hit the building, seriously lol. Do you think every camera the government has put up is there waiting for planes to hit buildings?
come on use your head before you type such rubbish, there are mutliple reasons why the pentagon should be under 24hr surveillance with high-tech equipment(as it no doubt was at the time).
I'm pretty sure being " tasked with discovering adversary intentions and capabilities" would include putting the heart of the American military under constant high-tech survillance.
One hint for you, stay away from work in the intelligence field, it's not for you.
Not really a security camera Artist Wolfgang Staehle webcam of the Manhattan skyline - picture taken every 4 seconds Captured American 11 approach and impact on North Tower.
The conspiracy loons have already proclaimed it a fake
So even if clear footage of American 77 existed would still deny it
so there were a hundred witnesses that specifically saw it was a passenger jet that hit the building, from an immigrant from El Salvador watering the lawns to a computer programmer packing to move from a nearby apartment complex.
Up until now, the conspiracy mongers don't want to accept the fact their conspiracies are wrong so they accuse these witnesses of being "secret gov't disinformation agents", the aircraft wreckage is all "planted evidence", the human remains were all "staged", and so on.
If the conspiracy mongors are going to be THAT childish, then what real difference does it make even if there is any more footage? They'll just accuse the footage of being faked just like they're accusing everything else of being faked.
It's one thing if the conspiracy people genuinely wanted to know more about the 9/11 attack. It's another thing entirely for them to rewrite the events of 9/11 to their liking.
Becuase these images were recorded to tape, and they use the 1:5 ratio to save storage on the tape.
Thanks for proving my point That "truthers" dont care about objective evidence that conflicts with fantasies So just what is "useless" about it Is one of only 3 images taken of AA11 impact on North Tower
Originally posted by CatJockey
That's 2. 98 to go ... Where can I find info documenting the other 98 you claim so I can evaluate the veracity of your claims? Names, perhaps? And even if no names, at least reports that document 100 eye witnesses? Or were you told this by a reporter on T.V. perhaps?
Source please.
Afework Hagos , a computer programmer, was on his way to work but stuck ... Omar Campo, a Salvadorean, was cutting the grass on the other side of the .....
Originally posted by CatJockey
To be fair, I am looking and have found about 20 eyewitness accounts ...