It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OUNjahhryn
could that be a buoy that got caught on a shark or whale?
Originally posted by Cobaltic1978
Okay, I don't normally do this, but this looks like CGI.
I'm sure it was original footage of a Dolphin that has been altered. Just lookinhg at the path the ORB took, looks exactly like how a Dolphin would act.
I'm no expert in this, but it doesn't look real, if you know what I mean.
Shame people feel inclined to do such things, I think it takes it away from the genuine footage.
Originally posted by Cobaltic1978
But, this looks totally fake imo.
On Saturday, September 17, 2011, a swiftly moving white orb was spottted chasing a boat in the ocean off the coast of Sweden. It is unclear which specific body of water was the site of this amazing event. The North Atlantic Ocean and the Arctic Ocean are two possibilities.
Of course, the object isn't technically a UFO since there is no evidence the unidentified object was flying. Instead, the perfectly round bright white object was moving fluidly through the water and keeping pace with a small boat.
Armed Forces: "Could be a submarine." Jan Thomquist, Navy tactical commander.
Buoy movements baffle even the Armed Forces. Now Malin Quran's film carefully analyzed.
"We take the material seriously. One cannot exclude that a submarine is involved," says Jan Thomquist, Navy tactical commander. Sailing Friends observations from Maseskar have reached the Armed Forces.
Now the data analyzed. "I understand that they reacted to the buoy movements, the data are very interesting," says Jan Thomquist, Navy tactical commander of the Armed Forces.
Examine the position. Now, analysts, among other things to pick up additional witness statements, investigating the precise location, weather conditions, currents and sail the boat's cruising speed.
"It's too early to say what this is. The reason could be the strong currents, but really, I would not give any more comments until we have completed the analysis," he says. Excludes no . . . If a submarine can be involved he would not rule [it] out.
"I have no reason to do so. The analysis will show. We estimate that we have received this report and we will take it very seriously."