It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
this is absolutely untrue.
* Immediately saving lives by effectively repealing Roe v. Wade and preventing activist judges from interfering with state decisions on life by removing abortion from federal court jurisdiction through legislation modeled after his “We the People Act.”
* Defining life as beginning at conception by passing a “Sanctity of Life Act.”
Also, it is certain that if public schooling was eliminated, that several, affordable, schooling firms would open up to fill that gap.
I have to reply to this typical american comment, If you don't want kids, then keep it in your pants, or don't open your legs! pure and simple, As far as maybe rape or along those lines, the the matter should be considered, but not just cause of the first... im biting my tongue here with this comment
Aaah yes, the old right to kill another human being. I guess now we will just argue over what a human being is even though at conception the ovum has all that is a human in it. Just... wow. How about if a woman doesnt want to have a baby she doesnt #? What about women that are raped? Well, I have always believed that two wrongs dont make a right, if you would rather kill the child than live with it for 9 months and give it up maybe the right thing to do is kill yourself.
Originally posted by HauntWok
reply to post by EagleTalonZ
He's crazy? Why? Cuz he actually defends and supports the Constitution?
Why? Because he wants to overturn Roe V Wade and force women to have children they don't want. For someone who is supposedly against government involvement in people's personal lives, this puts a huge hole in that "less government into people's lives" idea.
Why? Because Ron Paul wants to take poor kids out of the classroom, destroy the public education system and force their parents to home-school them, thus ensuring that we have a larger gap between the have's and the have not's. It's just fine if you are wealthy and want to send your child to a private school, but if you can't afford that, well, he wants you to home school Timmy.
With parents who had sub standard education their lives thanks to the Reagan Era education cuts, this will certainly put a large percentage of children on the wrong track to meaningless jobs and less opportunities. Again, I am sure that there are parents out there that can do an exceptional job in homeschooling their children, but most can't.
Why? Because Ron Paul is a religious zealot and would govern via Christian Cannon Law. He even points this out in his "statement of faith" tab on his campaign website. I'm sorry, this is a Republic, not a theocracy, and I don't want a religious cult leader in charge of the country.
Originally posted by HauntWok, and Ron Paul for however sense he actually makes is bat (snip) insane
Originally posted by HauntWok
If you are pro life, good for you. If you find you or your significant other pregnant, have the child. Just don't force your decision on other people and don't let the government make that decision for you. That's not freedom..
Originally posted by HauntWok
If you all want to see the REAL Ron Paul, might I suggest looking at his donations near votes...
maplight.org...
That will give you a real sense as to who Ron Paul really works for, and I'll give you a hint, it's not you.
Special interest groups pay Paul per vote and they usually get what they want and that is the REAL Ron Paul and that's why he shouldn't be elected.
Originally posted by HauntWok
reply to post by SquirrelNutz
Resign yourself to this fact: a democrat is not going to see the next Presidency - Obama has made sure of that.
I certainly hope you're right. The last thing we need for this union is yet another Democrat. (well, second to last thing, we certainly don't need Ron Paul in the white house either)
Romney is just a white Obama, and Perry is just a more radical George W. Bush. Good lord, don't we have anyone better?
The only person I will vote for is the independent that more closely represents my values. For those who think that's a wasted vote. I say, it's time to tell the PTB that a vote for an independent is never a wasted vote, it's a vote for the people.
Originally posted by dex77
Ron Paul doesn't want pro life... He wants each state to decide for themselves.
Originally posted by Aggie Man
After reading the title of this thread, I thought to myself "no freaking way". So, I did a Google search and, much to my surprise, Ron Paul is exploding.
I know, pics or it didn't happen.....
Ewww!, I hope I don't get any on ME!