It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Tsurugi
My answer is yes.
Originally posted by JiggyPotamus
I wouldn't kill him. It doesn't matter that you would have saved so many lives, as killing him makes you no better. Taking life is taking life, the quantity is irrelevant.
Originally posted by Fractured.Facade
Originally posted by Tsurugi
My answer is yes.
Yes to what?
Yes you would intervene?
Yes you would do nothing?
Yes ________________________________?
Originally posted by Fractured.Facade
reply to post by Agarta
Until after that time has passed, I'll withhold my personal decision/choice... Even though it is irrelevant, and unnecessary.. You'll have it... Then.
The only for sure thing we knew in this experiment was that it was hypothetical
Originally posted by Fractured.Facade
reply to post by cry93
Excellent points... But I can assure you that my state of mind here is well, and there is no worries in that regard.. This discussion isn't about me, in any way... It is all, after all, theoretical.
A tough one, for anyone who would choose to openly deal with such dilemmas... You are free to assume whatever you want about me in this context, even the worst, or that it is all real... Or that I am some lunatic, But I want to make one thing very clear... This thread is NOT about me, in any way shape or form.