It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by megabogie
reply to post by jimnuggits
But how could the soul learn a lesson if they chose not to follow the prompt?
Originally posted by Fractured.Facade
Originally posted by muzzleflash
I see what the point of this is and I am defeating that point.
You could be hardening the resolve here as well.
Again, how do you reconcile inaction, in this case, as outlined in the OP, when it comes to pass, as seen and known and you did nothing?
Originally posted by Iamonlyhuman
Originally posted by LiveEquation
I think experience is not all that counts since experiences are not 'truth' but are subjective too.
Truth is not what counts to an individual because truth is shaped by belief. Belief is gained from experience. So I disagree with you, experience is what counts
Originally posted by jennybee35
I really have no idea. The thought of 'saving the world' is very tempting, but actually altering the course of human history would not be a responsibility I would be anxious to take on.
Too many possible, infinite outcomes for my brain to process. Whose plan are we living by anyway? Would I have any right to assume I could interfere with it?edit on 9/17/11 by jennybee35 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sonofliberty1776
If I could go back in time. If I had only one bullet. If I had to choose between Hitler and FDR. I would shoot the one who did the most lasting damage to the US. Hint, it wasn't Hitler.
Originally posted by LiveEquation
Truth is not shaped by beliefs. People choose to equate truth with faith.
Truth is something that cannot change no matter what is done to it. There is nothing like that in this world. Only an idea can suggest that.
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
If I could confirm that what I was seeing was indeed future vents, then I might act. I couldn't make a decision unless I were faced with the actual scenario and assessed my thoughts and feelings at that time.
Originally posted by Fractured.Facade
Originally posted by watermama
There are times when I think this world would be a much better place without humans....or at least without so many!
Interesting, that is exactly what this man believes, and that is the core of his motive.
He will go off-grid, in about 43.5 hours, untouchable and unreachable...
7 years was the timeline in the "experience" there are variables, but the unmitigated outcome is certain. If you choose to identify him, expose the plot, do everything you can to stop him, you wont get far, before you are removed from the equation... All of those efforts are doomed to fail, but I suppose it is a better option than the other?
You have about 43.5 hours remaining....
Originally posted by Fractured.Facade
It's rapidly approaching the time where a clear consensus is made.
So to anyone following this thread... Please include an answer in your posts, make it simple and to the point as much as possible... Would you (given what is available in my posts in this thread) kill this man, sacrificing yourself in the process? Or would you choose no action? and last.. Would you choose another option despite likely failure to mitigate the worst possible outcome?
Of course, any and all other content are welcome as well.
Originally posted by Fractured.Facade
Would you choose another option despite likely failure to mitigate the worst possible outcome?