It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
'd just like to see another photo of an aircraft that crashes into the ground without any sort of visible debris field. I always thought that was very suspicious of flt 93 ever since the day it happened. It's an aluminum airplane for crying out loud. Why the lack of debris around the impact location?
We all saw what happened recently when a Reno Mustang went straight into the ground at full throttle, the entire airplane bounced off the earth in pieces, leaving a huge debris field in all directions. Yes flight 93 was a larger airplane, but the basic physics still apply. Both planes are made of the same materials. But one suspiciously performs like a bunker buster bomb when it crashes, while it should have left wreckage everywhere.
If you look at photos of the crash scene of any other airline accident, there is always a debris field.
Oh, and maybe that mushroom cloud of the impact should be a bit darker, but to me the lack of debris was always the real red flag.
If 9/11 really happened as advertised, I really don't think people would still be questioning the details of it ten years later.
First thirty seconds says quite a lot regarding Flight 93 there, no? Debris 6 miles away? I never even knew about this detail until now. I guess that ties right in with recent threads talking about Cheney admitting the order was given to shoot it down? Ah well, it's all water under the bridge now.
Originally posted by Sek82
Why the lack of debris around the impact location?
Originally posted by ATH911
Can ANYBODY explain to me how was there even an explosion at Shanksville that doesn't contradict the crash details?
Originally posted by ATH911
reply to post by septic
They really seem scared of the details of the alleged crash, don't they?!
Originally posted by septic
They get angry and nasty when the details are scrutinized, that's for sure.
Originally posted by ATH911
Originally posted by Sek82
Why the lack of debris around the impact location?
hooper, you "forgot" to answer this question of his. I'm curious of your answer too.
Originally posted by ATH911
Can ANYBODY explain to me how was there even an explosion at Shanksville that doesn't contradict the crash details?
Originally posted by ATH911
Can ANYBODY explain to me how was there even an explosion at Shanksville that doesn't contradict the crash details?
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
There's loads of burned grass.
Originally posted by ATH911
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
There's loads of burned grass.
Really?! Please show. Can't wait to see this!
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Look at almost any picture of the Shanksville crash site. There's a big bit in the middle with no grass.
Check the forest. Not technically grass, but there's a huge burned section.
Can you genuinely not see this?