It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GenRadek
Nope, that never happened. Hell even THAT junk has been debunked years ago. Why is it still being brought up? Are you just scraping the bottom of the barrel?
Originally posted by ATH911
Originally posted by GenRadek
Nope, that never happened. Hell even THAT junk has been debunked years ago. Why is it still being brought up? Are you just scraping the bottom of the barrel?
Wait, you're saying you've never seen another plane crash leave wing scars in the ground, which would be evidence the Shanksville plane crash (which supposedly left wing scars) was staged, then you go on about stuff being debunked years ago.
What was "debunked" years ago? Are you agreeing you too have never seen another plane crash leave wing scars in the ground?
Originally posted by GenRadek
As for wing scars happening? I have not been to many plane crash sites. Have you?
Originally posted by ATH911
Now, have you have seen another plane crash leave wing scars in the ground?
Originally posted by ATH911
Originally posted by GenRadek
The dimensions fit a 757. Are you that blind or just ignorant? Just tell us how big the crater is suppose to be?
Have you ever seen a plane crash leave wing scars in the ground prior or after 9/11?
Originally posted by ATH911
"Officially speaking" and a person, with common sense, who didn't quite understand what I meant with "officially speaking" by just reading my title would have exercised their common sense and read my OP to know what I meant by that.
But if you want to judge a book by a cover, that's your choice.
Then what did you mean by it?
Just saying, never saw an explosion from a non-9/11 plane crash not produce a black smoke cloud. Prove me wrong.
I and others are convinced upon viewing all available evidence and reviewing eyewitnesses testimony that the crater in Shanksville was not caused by a Boeing 757.
Originally posted by waypastvne
I know of two other crashes that left very visible wing marks.
You can just look at the picture and say: Yes.The wing hit right there.
i.imgur.com...
The impression the plane left is amazingly similar to the shape of the Shanksville crater.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
So the thread is not an appeal for an answer to the question of how a plane exploded on crashing into the ground at Shanksville?
What is it then?
I merely pointed out that you said that the evidence could suggest a plane crash.
Smoke lightens in colour as it dissipates. Cameras alter tints and colours. I can prove these things if you like, but I'm not sure I want to end up proving to you that 2+2 = 4.
Originally posted by GenRadek
Well I looked around, here is a good one:
www.ww2incolor.com...
Wing scars!
Originally posted by ATH911
Another weird looking ground. You skeptics sure bring up weird looking grounds.
Now, you done trolling?
Originally posted by ATH911
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
So the thread is not an appeal for an answer to the question of how a plane exploded on crashing into the ground at Shanksville?
Um, no.
What is it then?
And you wonder why I call you "slow"!
Key word: "could." And notice I didn't say what type of plane.
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Shadow Herder
I and others are convinced upon viewing all available evidence and reviewing eyewitnesses testimony that the crater in Shanksville was not caused by a Boeing 757.
Bully for you! Now why don't you and the others get together and give us some basic science...
The impression the plane left is amazingly similar to the shape of the Shanksville crater.
I dont have to.
The information you request has been outlined quite clearly in numerous flight 93 threads that proved the crater was not caused by a Boeing 757.
Originally posted by GenRadek
Hey, I'm not the one who has a hard time understanding that when a plane plows into the ground at 500MPH, it explodes and has debris scattered every which way including some being buried into the ground and some being ejected, and then goes on and ridicules and ignores every person that shows up to explain it as simply as possible.
The crash you describe is not how UA93 supposedly crashed.