posted on Sep, 17 2011 @ 02:29 AM
Originally posted by Wookiep
reply to post by Blanca Rose
Using logic to dictate a judgment if a life is on the line involving vehicular manslaughter, clearly is one thing. Using stupidity to justify an
un-warranted murder via "running over a foot" is another. This wasn't a bank robbery. Even with that said, you can't compare the two at all.
Cops always use the excuse "my life was on the line!!" when killing people. When is enough, enough? We've seen cops tase elementary school
children, seriously! When should the UBER COWARDNESS end?? These cops I gotta say, these days are pure pansy-ass babies!
The woman with the baby in the back seat wasn't robbing the bank, either. She was trying to pass a bad check.
I understand your frustration, but these guys who are cops, deputy's, whatever are putting their lives on the line. They don't know a suspect from
Jack. So, you think they should take a chance at pleasantries and getting to know a person before they make a decision?
You might hear about situations like this, what about the others? The domestic violence situtaions they walk into, the situations where they do have
to worry about serious violence?
If anything, they are hyper vigilant to a potentially dangerous situation at all times.
I'd like to think everybody is not a threat while just walking down the street. Just imagine what they encounter in the course of their day, keeping
Not all areas have enforcement that are the town of Mayberry, and I can betcha, that the donut eating scenario is a farce, too!