posted on Sep, 28 2011 @ 01:04 AM
Well, I just watched the entire video, obviously unlike some of the immediate debunkers and or those making debunking attempts. I had seen some
of the short clips presented on ATS in the past and yes, the button hypotheses did seem to fit. But many of the films presented were not shot through
his window, so that kind of negates that explanation as a total debunk...
I was ready to throw out this whole case myself until I saw some of the nighttime footage, especially the triangular craft. Also the lighting on many
of the objects which are reflections of the sun or ground lights seem to add some credence to the case...
It seems there are many pluses and minuses going on here. The fact that many of his friends and family have witnessed these events and that they have
taken place in many different areas are a plus. The totality of the numerous sightings could be looked at as a minus unless we go with the theory that
UFO's have a tendency to pick out individuals to repeatedly show themselves to (contactees?) Many of the objects are obviously very high in the sky
which defeats the button on the window theory. But, the constant references to Meier and Adamski are definitely a minus. And also bringing Mausson in
could be seen as a negative. I really don't believe Mausson is a hoaxer, but he is very gullible and sees every balloon, light or strange creature as
proof of ET. And he tends to support videos that do turn out to be hoaxes...
I also think that Delittoso's work has some validity, along with the analysis done by others viewing the videos. It sometimes amazes me that obvious
hoaxes can run on to 20 pages of posts in a couple days, but when a half-way decent case and footage is presented, 2 sentences from your guru
debunkers and the whole case is forgotten...
I am not some hard-core believer (that every light in the sky is ET, or even unidentifiable) and have become much more skeptical in the two years
I've been around this site. So I'm not buying this case hook-line-and-sinker, but I do believe its very interesting and could use much more concrete
analysis. The thread killers that throw out their force fit debunks based on a name or a couple seconds of an hour long presentation defeat the whole
purpose of this site...