It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by piles
reply to post by wmd_2008
i'm surprised that on a truther forum, the truthers are on the defence
come on truthers your hurting a true truthers reputation here, do it for all us truthers out there...
tbh im surprised anybody believes ten years on that anybody but america did it..
if i assume that one floor collapsed on the 80th floor as a result of the plane hitting, and 30 floors above fell as a result, then i would assume that the building would buckle. which then would lead to the building partial collapse..
i assuming but sounds more like what would happen to me..
Originally posted by wmd_2008
The answer you get is the reason why ANOK AND PSIK AVOID THE QUESTION AT ALL COSTS!!!
4i. When a moving object collides with a stationary object of identical mass, the stationary object encounters the greater collision force.
Answer...FALSE - In any collision, the colliding objects exert equal and opposite forces upon each other as the result of the collision interaction. There are no exceptions to this rule.
Originally posted by ANOK
What question?
Originally posted by ANOK
There is no question to avoid
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by wmd_2008
The answer you get is the reason why ANOK AND PSIK AVOID THE QUESTION AT ALL COSTS!!!
What question?
The fact that when you consider only impact forces, you are ignoring equal opposite reaction law?
The fact that any impact forces would be felt equally by both falling and impacting floors?
You are the one ignoring the laws of motion that applies to ALL colliding objects, with no exceptions.
4i. When a moving object collides with a stationary object of identical mass, the stationary object encounters the greater collision force.
Answer...FALSE - In any collision, the colliding objects exert equal and opposite forces upon each other as the result of the collision interaction. There are no exceptions to this rule.
www.physicsclassroom.com...
There is no question to avoid because your question is bogus...
edit on 11/2/2011 by ANOK because: typo
Originally posted by waypastvne
Ok I'm getting lost here. Who all is in line here waiting on an answer from Anock ? Whats the Order ? Who goes first ? Am I next in line ? Do I need To take a number and have a seat ?
I'm sorry if I jumped line I'll wait my turn. Sorry.
waypastvne
Please tell us Voodoo Physicist If the buildings momentum was NOT 0.000 and its kinetic energy was NOT 0.000
Then what was the buildings momentum P=M x V ___?___ (please fill in the blank)
And what was the buildings kinetic energy KE=1/2 x M x V^2 ___?___ (please fill in the blank)
And how does having 0.000 momentum and 0.000 kinetic energy cancel out the equal opposite reaction law.
If the blanks are not filled the question is not answered.
Originally posted by Electrum
Key-Rist! 60 pages! This is incredible. I don't have time to read this much "stuff". Did anyone, just to cut to the chase here, did anyone think that the "outside energy source" might be HAARP type energy?
Originally posted by waypastvne
Please tell us Voodoo Physicist If the buildings momentum was NOT 0.000 and its kinetic energy was NOT 0.000
Then what was the buildings momentum P=M x V ___?___ (please fill in the blank)
And what was the buildings kinetic energy KE=1/2 x M x V^2 ___?___ (please fill in the blank)
And how does having 0.000 momentum and 0.000 kinetic energy cancel out the equal opposite reaction law.
If the blanks are not filled the question is not answered.
In a collision between object 1 and object 2, the force exerted on object 1 (F1) is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the force exerted on object 2 (F2). In equation form:
F1 = - F2
The above statement is simply an application of Newton's third law of motion to the collision between objects 1 and 2. Now in any given interaction, the forces which are exerted upon an object act for the same amount of time. You can't contact another object and not be contacted yourself (by that object). And the duration of time during which you contact the object is the same as the duration of time during which that object contacts you. Touch a wall for 2.0 seconds, and the wall touches you for 2.0 seconds. Such a contact interaction is mutual; you touch the wall and the wall touches you. It's a two-way interaction - a mutual interaction; not a one-way interaction. Thus, it is simply logical to state that in a collision between object 1 and object 2, the time during which the force acts upon object 1 (t1) is equal to the time during which the force acts upon object 2 (t2). In equation form:
t1 = t2
The basis for the above statement is simply logic. Now we have two equations which relate the forces exerted upon individual objects involved in a collision and the times over which these forces occur. It is accepted mathematical logic to state the following:
If A = - B
and C = D
then A • C = - B • D
The above logic is fundamental to mathematics and can be used here to analyze our collision.
If F1 = - F2
and t1 = t2
then F1 • t1 = - F2 • t2
The above equation states that in a collision between object 1 and object 2, the impulse experienced by object 1 (F1 • t1) is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the impulse experienced by object 2 (F2 • t2).
Forces always come in pairs - known as "action-reaction force pairs."
Originally posted by wmd_2008
A little bit of info for everyone
READ THIS ANOK AND PSIK YOU MAY ACTUALLY LEARN SOMETHING
hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...
Newton's third law: All forces in the universe occur in equal but oppositely directed pairs. There are no isolated forces; for every external force that acts on an object there is a force of equal magnitude but opposite direction which acts back on the object which exerted that external force.
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Hi ALL
Here is an example of impact physics.
A CAR CRASH
This link lets you calculate the impact force of a car crash.
hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...
Now this should be impossible to do according to ANOK as we dont know the mass
of the tree
It would also be impossible according to psik becuase we dont know the (distribution
of the steelwork in the tree) only joking sorry the strength/resistance of the tree.
Now these guys try to make themselves out as some kind of physics whizz kids
mainly because one keeps preaching about the laws of motion and what he thinks
is a simple 2 mass equation.
Unless you have data on every tree how can you figure out what will happen?