Theres been a lot of posts in this forum just recently about the Ancient Aliens series from the history channel and how things like the Pyramids and
the statues of easter islands etc might have been built. Today i found this documentary that covers a large range of the subjects and monuments
covered by the AA series and attempts to explain some of the mysteries that the AA theorists insist must be attributed to aliens and alien technology.
This documentary tends to present a more human explanation to some (but not all) of these ancient mysteries.
So im presenting it as a possible antithesis to some of the claims made by the Ancient Aliens series.
On the other hand goes a lot further in pointing out some very strange things about these ancient monuments that the AA series has missed and that
still cant be explained today. The documentary trys to explain why things may have been done rather than how. One of the experts points out that
ancient aliens just might be a possibility, so its not all anti UFO . It also puts forward the possible theory of a much more advanced older
civilization that has long since disappeared. Which ever way you look at it this is a very interesting documentary and i highly recomend watching it
if you are into the subject.
edit on 16-9-2011 by PhoenixOD because: (no reason given)
What a great doc. I always believed that the Pyramids were built around 10.000 BC by a lost civilization (probably the Atlanteans), Now I am even more
They forgot to mention 3 very important things though.
1. The Sphinx's head was rebuild by the Egyptians when they found it. It was a lion before. (there is proof on other websites, documentaries)
2. The center room in the Great Giza receives 100% light straight from Sirius star but not today as the stars move. The alignment was perfect around
10.000 BC. And that is the message for the construction time!
3. Probably the ancient civilization who built all this stuff was the Atlantis.
It is a good documentary, and it covers some interesting 'facts'. But, it does frankly only mention one side of the story. The 'other' side of the
story is presented and argued by one man that is seemingly ignoring alot of the proposed facts, and quite honestly seems crazy in his ignorance. This
leads me to believe the entirety of the documentary are false, because they're unwilling to give anyone with real authority on the matter to be
heard. By the way the documentary are flagrantly portaying its seemingly predetermined and 'factual' side of the story, while swiftly knocking down
its prime (yet crazy) opposer, doesn't give this story any credence.
While its mathematical side seems sound, it does not account for its blatant apocalyptic assumptions. And let's be real, mathematics can be construed
to be anything. Even if the mathematical side of the puzzle is real, which I doubt it really is, the way it jumps to acopalyptic scenarios makes it
false by its assumptions.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.