Michelle Obama Faces Five Years in Prison - Active Federal Investigation Against Her, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 15 times


reply posted on 17-9-2011 @ 09:58 AM by The Sword
reply to post by ColoradoJens



Your source is a tabloid.

Umm, hello? These things are on newsstands everywhere. I suppose you think Batboy is real too?


reply posted on 17-9-2011 @ 10:12 AM by ColoradoJens
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to
post by ColoradoJens



Your source is a tabloid.

Umm, hello? These things are on newsstands everywhere. I suppose you think Batboy is real too?


Exactly. Please read my final post.

CJ



reply posted on 17-9-2011 @ 10:14 AM by ColoradoJens
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
reply to
post by iNkGeEk



I do to. I would have posted from the WWN if it ran something similar to this. That was my intent to begin with. This is a complete non-story with the enquirer as the source.

Depending on when it suits our agendas, we don't care what the source is. Depending on the message conveyed, it is ok to use unscrupulous sources...The Enquirer is about 10 notches above other quoted sources like World Net Daily - they did break the Edwards story - but that is the angle - sleaze stories if they can get them - sometimes they do - most the time it is lindsay lohan sleazing it up for them...

With out any real info in the OP "story" to begin with, it is interesting to see the responses.

The entire thing is trivial in the extreme and yet, with nothing but our enquierer's mini "story" we are able to attack and defend our "positions" to the bitter end. Does any one else see where I am going?

I wonder how many people believe I don't like Obama or Michelle because I posted this?

I wonder how many people really don't care about the "crime" but the person who did it?

I wonder why we can denounce sources one minute and then use them when it suits our positions?

I wonder why this non story garnered any attention at all?

I wonder why more people didn't question the source or statement the feds were active in searching for them...I couldn't find more than the "story" mentioned...is there really one?

I wonder if there is any form of critical thinking going on when it comes to these subjects?

Why can't anyone admit they are wrong anymore?

Why can't people laugh at themselves anymore?

Why must we demand we are right when we are not critical of our own review process?

Why is it so easy to define our own countrymen with a varying opinions as a "terrorists" "nazis" "commies" "libtards" etc? I mean, are we really all that different?

Peace

CJ
edit on 17-9-2011 by ColoradoJens because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 18-9-2011 @ 12:02 AM by ColoradoJens
Originally posted by TreesusChrist
Wow, these forums are hilarious.


For once, I can say I fully agree with the new poster - thanks.
I realized I came back too late to the thread to post what I did a page back.
These threads (this is mine) stir up the most amazing back and forth that never really accomplishes anything and no real issues are ever discussed. The source is the Enquirer for Christmas' sake.
How do we come to the decicions we do?:

Again from my previous post:

I do to. I would have posted from the WWN if it ran something similar to this. That was my intent to begin with. This is a complete non-story with the enquirer as the source.

Depending on when it suits our agendas, we don't care what the source is. Depending on the message conveyed, it is ok to use unscrupulous sources...The Enquirer is about 10 notches above other quoted sources like World Net Daily - they did break the Edwards story - but that is the angle - sleaze stories if they can get them - sometimes they do - most the time it is lindsay lohan sleazing it up for them...

With out any real info in the OP "story" to begin with, it is interesting to see the responses.

The entire thing is trivial in the extreme and yet, with nothing but our enquierer's mini "story" we are able to attack and defend our "positions" to the bitter end. Does any one else see where I am going?

I wonder how many people believe I don't like Obama or Michelle because I posted this?

I wonder how many people really don't care about the "crime" but the person who did it?

I wonder why we can denounce sources one minute and then use them when it suits our positions?

I wonder why this non story garnered any attention at all?

I wonder why more people didn't question the source or statement the feds were active in searching for them...I couldn't find more than the "story" mentioned...is there really one?

I wonder if there is any form of critical thinking going on when it comes to these subjects?

Why can't anyone admit they are wrong anymore?

Why can't people laugh at themselves anymore?

Why must we demand we are right when we are not critical of our own review process?

Why is it so easy to define our own countrymen with a varying opinions as a "terrorists" "nazis" "commies" "libtards" "racists" etc? I mean, are we really all that different?

Peace

CJ
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Ron Paul Didn\'t Bully Anyone Or Do Drugs in High School!
  Posted 19 days ago with 26 member flags
Mitt Was A High School Bully
  Posted 19 days ago with 20 member flags
Vale Don Ritchie: the angel of the gap
  Posted 14 days ago with 18 member flags
Obama: \'Sometimes I Forget\' Magnitude of the Recession
  Posted 18 days ago with 16 member flags
One of these politicians is not like the others
  Posted 4 days ago with 16 member flags
5 Big Accomplishments of President Obama
  Posted 7 days ago with 9 member flags
Obama Campaign Uses Mother’s Day to Raise Cash
  Posted 16 days ago with 7 member flags