It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kokoro
Its not "dodgy" , HPV is sexually transmitted, boys are carriers and you want to vaccinate before they initiate sexual activity because a vaccine cannot help you if you already have the infection.
Originally posted by NuclearPaul
If the girls are vaccinated, then what is the problem?
If the vaccine works, there shouldn't even be a need to vaccinate boys.
Originally posted by Griffo
reply to post by skitzspiricy
Well yeah, but I'd rather not argue semantics
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
My dad was forced to take the swine flu vaccine when that crap hit the fan because he was a correctional officer and it was mandatory. Now he has parkinsons disease and can't stop shaking, He got parkinsons 6 months after taking the swine flu vaccine and we have no family history of anyone with neurological disorders.
Correlation does not imply causation.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
Perhaps you did not.
Perhaps you should check again.
Controversy Scientists associated with the initial development of recombinant DNA methods recognized that the potential existed for organisms containing recombinant DNA to have undesirable or dangerous properties. At the 1975 Asilomar Conference on Recombinant DNA, these concerns were discussed and a voluntary moratorium on recombinant DNA research was initiated for experiments that were thought to be particularly risky. This moratorium was widely observed until the National Institutes of Health (USA) developed and issued formal guidelines for rDNA work. Today, recombinant DNA molecules and recombinant proteins are usually not regarded as dangerous. However, concerns remain about some organisms that express recombinant DNA, particularly when they leave the laboratory and are introduced into the environment or food chain. These concerns are discussed in the articles on genetically-modified organisms and genetically-modified food controversies.
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
Total of 69 deaths in the USA alone. Isn't that enough reason right there? Where did you get your link. Mine is from CDC.gov.
If you bothered to read my posts, you would see I linked to the same page. The only difference is, I bothered to READ the page. It very clearly stated in the "DEATHS" section that, to date, not a single death has been linked to the vaccine, but rather were reported (as is required) because the vaccine was given at some point near the person's time of death.
It looks like a double edged sword to me. Safe sex and a healthy lifestyle certainly outweighs the risks of the vaccine. To each their own I guess.
PLEASE READ MY FIRST POST.
SAFE SEX DOES NOT PREVENT HPV.
People like you are the reason I still see so many HPV-infected patients. How can I take you seriously in this thread if you won't do even one iota of research into the rates of HPV infection with safe sex?
No its not an epic fail., mainly because its more evidence having only 29 people than anything you have provided in this entire thread thus far. Second, mild tenderness is considered a "reaction" but is far less than deadly , don't you agree? Third, this is only a snippet of things I found in about 5 minutes, of course I cannot list the entirely of the literature. My point was to show a snapshot and it clearly shows that the vaccine is safe and has been properly tested. Why don't you show me some real studies that show otherwise?