It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Who cares? Even if it is proven that the shroud dates to c.33AD, what does that prove? Absolutely nothing! It simply proves that you have a 2000-year-old burial shroud. Historically interesting, yes, and relatively unique, but the connection between this cloth and Jesus Christ is stretching the imagination so far as to be ridiculous. Only the faithful will believe it anyway, and those people who need their faith to be bolstered by something as trivial as this need to question why they believe in the first place. The altars of Catholic Europe are full of the interred bones of saints who, if their existence is to be believed, must have had 7 legs and 97 ribs.
Only your sinful mind and soulless heart could think of such a thing.
You obviously don't know the relevance of a lion and Jesus
i don't supposed you've ever read a book let alone the bible.
As for it being hideous i would have to disagree.
Your just jealous you can't put up a better avatar because you don't know how.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
reply to post by Sed Non Credo
I don't think dinosaurs were ugly,
Maybe we are talking about things of the spirit not necessarily the flesh, but I imagine the Biblical writers made a distinction between man and animals, unlike now, we are just educated apes?
edit on 063030p://bFriday2011 by Stormdancer777 because: (no reason given)