Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl12
reply to post by BO XIAN
I see what your saying Bo Xian, if the war started 10 years ago, then it was more like a cold war or rather a powder keg to bring about WWIII. Is this
correct or am I off?
Welllllllllllllll I suppose we could look at it on several levels . . .
I think your description is an apt one. Perhaps I'd say an incremental powder-keg lit off toward moving more pieces toward a major, all major powers
Satan certainly began his war against God's favorite creation--mankind--millenia ago--with this END TIMES ERA particularly planned and strategized
for . . . and likely deceptions millenia in the creation thereof.
The Cross was a fulcrum for all creation and all eternity and the legal defeat of satan and his values and forces proven by the Resurrection.
Yet, Christ has yet to take possession of all that's HIS on this stage of the CONCLUDING DRAMA.
Some say the globalists are a mostly seamless set of wealth, families and demonic gods going back to Babylon, down through the Roman Empire to the
more or less same families in Europe and America etc. Others just say the globalist plots and schemes go back 400 years.
Certainly the globalists have been moving the geopolitical puzzle pieces ever more inexorably toward their more overtly total control and total
tyranny for at least 110 years. I've seen quotes in their own words and documents back that far.
Certainly they have set up and triggered and managed all the "hot" wars in that 110 years.
I don't know that it is particularly useful to say that WWIII began with the Oklahoma bombing or 911 or Lybia or Syria or whatever . . . It seems to
me that the line we'd draw with such limited mile posts toward the ultimate Anti-Christ tyranny would be very arbitrary.
The average citizen won't likely consider the ageless conflict to have become WWIII until they see bombs landing on USA soil.
imho, one could also consider the insertion of Barak into the White House as a chronically lying Muslim Kenyan traitor imposter criminal Destroyer in
Chief as a very arrogant act of war by the globalists. Yet, was Bush Sr less of a traitor and destroyer because he was more slick, hidden etc. in his
criminal thuggery? Have they not all contributed outrageously toward the destrution of the USA and the global Western way of life as well as the
looming global confligration and the eventual global tyranny?
I don't think that when the overt WWIII global conflagration begins in earnest--folks will have far more important things to do than to speculate and
pontificate on when, technically, did the OBVIOUS WWIII begin.
Now, it's a somewhat idle hobby of speculation somewhat more interesting than solitaire on the computer. LOL.
imho, of course.