Have I found a photo of some wreckage of an aircraft at the Pentagon?, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 15-9-2011 @ 04:02 PM by JIMC5499
reply to post by Alpha20mega



Nothing against you, but, that website is crap. The wing flaps being hoisted in pic 13 are much larger than those on an A-3 or a EB-66. That yellow tow bar in pic 12 is made up of 2 parts each about 4 inches wide. The black section of the crane in pic 13 is about 14 inches wide.

I worked on and around A-3s in the Navy.
edit on 15-9-2011 by JIMC5499 because: typo



reply posted on 15-9-2011 @ 04:22 PM by redoubt
reply to post by Alpha20mega



The Pentagon event of 9.11 is the linchpin in uncovering the truth because... it simply did not happen as it is told to have happened.

What is most amazing is that those seeking the truth allow themselves to be waylaid and rerouted to the twin towers and WTC 7... where arguments can go one for eternity without ever producing indisputable proof.

The Pentagon event is the key to unraveling this story... it holds all the opening moves required for a winning closure. Unfortunately, those powers that be have successfully diverted us all back to New York, time and again.


reply posted on 15-9-2011 @ 04:50 PM by ANOK
reply to post by spiderbadarse



That's not really true.

Of course there was wreckage photographed, but just look at the wreckage.

Two rotor hubs, a piece of the combustion chamber, and a bunch of airframe that look nothing like it came from a plane that impacted a building and exploded.

Where are the rest of the engine parts, like the other 20+ rotor hubs, the two titanium rotor shafts, the titanium shatterproof engine casings?

We see about 2% of a Boeing jet in the released photographs.


reply posted on 15-9-2011 @ 05:33 PM by Alpha20mega
reply to post by Alpha20mega



Lets be honest, there is absolutely no evidence that a Boeing hit the Pentagon.
But that doesn't exclude the possibility that a smaller aircraft or missile did.

There are believable reports that some sort of aircraft flew into or over the Pentagon.

The wreckage in photograph 13 looks like one wing of the A3 in photograph 12 - no doubt.
It certainly doesn't look like a "structural beam".

The remains of a small engine were found, too small to be from a Boeing, but would fit an A3.


reply posted on 15-9-2011 @ 06:14 PM by Cassius666
reply to post by Alpha20mega



Well if it looks like a duck and walks like a duck. However which aircraft would have been able to punch through all 3 walls of the pentagon, if any? Would any aircraft have been able to? And if not, what does that mean? Planted explosives?


reply posted on 15-9-2011 @ 07:38 PM by thedman
reply to post by Cassius666



Well if it looks like a duck and walks like a duck. However which aircraft would have been able to punch through all 3 walls of the pentagon, if any? Would any aircraft have been able to? And if not, what does that mean? Planted explosives?


How many times do you have to be told that there were internal walls in the 2 lower floors of the PENTAGON !

The plane punched through the E ring (Exterior wall) - there were no walls (there were support columns) until
some of the debris punched through the C Ring wall to the interior roadway (A-E Drive)


According to the argument, the object that produced the hole had to travel through five masonry walls: The facade and inward-facing wall of the E-ring, two walls of the D-ring, and two walls of the C-ring. That would seem to be too much material for any component from a passenger jet to penetrate.

This argument is based on a misunderstanding of the Pentagon's design. In fact, the light wells between the C- and D-ring and D- and E-ring are only three stories deep. The first and second stories span the distance between the Pentagon's facade and the punctured C-ring wall, which faces a ground-level courtyard. There are no masonry walls in this space, only load-bearing columns. Thus it would be possible for an aircraft part that breached the facade to travel through this area on the ground floor, miss the columns, and puncture the C-ring wall without having encountering anything more than unsubstantial gypsum walls and furniture in-between.




reply posted on 15-9-2011 @ 08:22 PM by TupacShakur
reply to post by Alpha20mega



Lets be honest, there is absolutely no evidence that a Boeing hit the Pentagon.
But that doesn't exclude the possibility that a smaller aircraft or missile did.
I wouldn't go nearly that far, there's actually quite a bit of evidence that a Boeing hit the pentagon. Check this thread out.

There are believable reports that some sort of aircraft flew into or over the Pentagon.
I've heard of no such reports.


reply posted on 16-9-2011 @ 04:14 AM by Alpha20mega
reply to post by Cassius666



Only a missile, perhaps fired from the A3, would have the slightest chance of punching through multiple walls.

The "object" almost shown in the single image released by the Pentagon fits the size of an A3.

Explosives were used and there are multiple witnesses to this.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 13 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 5 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 15 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 9 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 17 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 19 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 9 days ago with 8 member flags