posted on Sep, 29 2011 @ 11:09 PM
Originally posted by EspyderMan
Originally posted by Aim64C
To be honest, it is always hard to tell with this type of thing.
Hard to tell? Did you read the site of this scientist? He is obviously not lying, their is enough proof to say he was involved with NASA and since he
was the lead for finding life in the way they did, what he says matters more to me then NASA. Looks to me like NASA was too busy covering things up.
NASA always stunk to me. Somethings not right.
All these weeks of sound and fury and no links to the unique investigations I’ve done and published over the years about the credibility [or lack of
it] of Johnston’s allegations. By no means do you HAVE to agree with the conclusions, but I would hope that the existence of this work could at
least be acknowledged and its credibility debated. But not this blanket coverup of its existence. Sigh.
My findings are that Johnston was never ‘a scientist’, was never in charge of the original Apollo film archive [he was a shipping clerk for lunar
samples, and would send copies of moon pictures to the scientists who received the samples]s, was never ‘head’ of anything having to do with
‘finding life’, was never a test pilot or a pilot of any kind during the space program, but did perform honorable military and space work at the
peon level. He never earned a “PhD” in anything, and decades after he had left Houston, his service as an unpaid volunteer in a JPL outreach
program ended over his using their website of volunteers’ credentials to ‘verify’ his possession of a PhD he had never earned.
Originally posted by charlyv
Ken Johnston is such a credible source, with his past positions at NASA, his career, education, and the testimonials of those that know him and have
worked with him... IMHO, what he is saying is true, and is just one more example of our tax dollars not earning us the right to the most incredible
story of all time. We, in the US, have been paying the entire bill for information we are not allowed to possess , by an agency designed and
chartered to provide that information publicly. This just has to end now. There is too much evidence. It is overwhelming. We need to take control of
our own destiny.
I don’t doubt your sincerity but I suggest your credulity is unwarranted. Does “credible” mean to you, “somebody telling any story that
thrills me and makes me feel smarter than my classmates”??
Originally posted by Blaine91555
I'm not going to read all these pages to do with what should be a well know hoax, so forgive me if I'm repeating what somebody else has already
posted. Ken Johnston uses his Doctoral Degree from Reform Baptist Theological Seminary of Denver as proof of his qualifications if you can imagine
that. It is well know as a place you could purchase a the Degree for about $3,500 and I've seen as low as $1,600 without attending a single class….
Have fun with this charade.
I’ve talked with the guy who signed Johnston’s certificate, the price may have been a lot lower. There never were any classes for ANYBODY to
attend -== it was a Post Office box.
Originally posted by Krusty the Klown
Forgetting US bases on the moon for a minute......How credible are the whistleblowers in the OP article.
Ken Johnston - who the article says worked for NASA for 40 years. (nothing in the article says he believes in US bases on the moon…
[snip other names]
Can we believe them or from another angle, why should we doubt them?
Johnson does believe that. He just never worked for NASA “for 40 years”, he was a techno-grunt in his 20’s during Apollo, then left – and
forty years later enlisted in a non-paid volunteer speakers bureau but quit in a dispute of his use of a dubious diploma on his official bio.