It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SpreadLoveNotHate
reply to post by muzzleflash
Space exists alright, space is what connects everything in the universe! Think about it... There's just no such thing as empty space, that would be nothing.edit on 15-9-2011 by SpreadLoveNotHate because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Observer99
The claim about the absence of matter in the sun is total nonsense. He uses poor whirlpool analogies and makes illogical extensions to planetary orbits, that's not science.
It is clear that we don't fully understand the sun. Maybe it does have a fusion core as is the standard theory. Maybe the energy is induced from electricity/magnetism as in the electric universe theory. But the vacuum thing is a load of bunk.
Originally posted by Arken
Is our Sun hollow? Is gravity being induced? According Stephen J. Goodfellow.... Yes! In this video he suggests that the Sun is a shell of sustained charged plasma encasing a non-space/absolute vacuum that induces gravity. All of its arguments match perfectly with physics laws. The Sun is a shell of hidrogen with an absolute vacuum interior...
Plausible.... and awesome!
edit on 15-9-2011 by Arken because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by xxcalbier
O my god did ever one FLUNK science 9th grade class???
you have one star it is spinning and planets are orbiting around that star at such and such speeds ,
for earth around 60k per hour . Now earth orbits the sun at this speed because the sun exerts a certain amount of gravitational pull on it . And the earth pulls away at a cirtian speed as well because of a little thing called cintrifical force , So wile the sun is pulling earth towards it the speed and mass of earth are pulling away from it.
over the coarse of millions of years a balance is reached were the suns pull and the earths pull equal out .
the result is our orbit . Now in order for the sun and earth to reach a balance each has a cirtian amount of MASS .
with the KNOWN factors of earths speed and earths mass you can calculate the suns mass .
Now if the sun was hollow as you think it would have to be MUCH larger in order to exert the same amount of force on earth as the mass HAS to be there in order for earth to be were it is,
The suns size is correct for the earths size and mass to be in the orbit it is.
Look up the suns MASS we know within a very small amount exactly what it is > you don't need to send a probe into it to learn this any more then you need a measuring tape to tell how far the moon of any other body is.
The suns mass and size equal what we look at each day and wile it does expand and contract slightly tahts because it gets hotter and cooler at times.
But hey dont take my word for it just take science class and stay AWAKE this time.
so If the sun had less mass earth would pull away if was larger ((in order to be hollow earth would be toast
All of its arguments match perfectly with physics laws.
Originally posted by kalisdad
Originally posted by xxcalbier
O my god did ever one FLUNK science 9th grade class???
you have one star it is spinning and planets are orbiting around that star at such and such speeds ,
for earth around 60k per hour . Now earth orbits the sun at this speed because the sun exerts a certain amount of gravitational pull on it . And the earth pulls away at a cirtian speed as well because of a little thing called cintrifical force , So wile the sun is pulling earth towards it the speed and mass of earth are pulling away from it.
over the coarse of millions of years a balance is reached were the suns pull and the earths pull equal out .
the result is our orbit . Now in order for the sun and earth to reach a balance each has a cirtian amount of MASS .
with the KNOWN factors of earths speed and earths mass you can calculate the suns mass .
Now if the sun was hollow as you think it would have to be MUCH larger in order to exert the same amount of force on earth as the mass HAS to be there in order for earth to be were it is,
The suns size is correct for the earths size and mass to be in the orbit it is.
Look up the suns MASS we know within a very small amount exactly what it is > you don't need to send a probe into it to learn this any more then you need a measuring tape to tell how far the moon of any other body is.
The suns mass and size equal what we look at each day and wile it does expand and contract slightly tahts because it gets hotter and cooler at times.
But hey dont take my word for it just take science class and stay AWAKE this time.
so If the sun had less mass earth would pull away if was larger ((in order to be hollow earth would be toast
that is a pretty bold opening statement considering all the spelling and grammatical errors you made...
the standard model has flaws, more and more people are seeing this all the time.
the problem is that after 100 years of pushing this science on the public, they don't want to backtrack and admit they were wrong, so they make things up to explain things that don't fit their theories
EU looks good to me, but still has a long way to go before overcoming the standard model
this guys theory has possibility, but he'll need more than a cup of coffee and some creamer to convince me
Originally posted by muzzleflash
There is no such thing as space.
By definition it describes emptiness, nothing.
Space doesn't exist, it's the absence of existence.
Originally posted by xxcalbier
O my god did ever one FLUNK science 9th grade class???
you have one star it is spinning and planets are orbiting around that star at such and such speeds ,
for earth around 60k per hour .
Originally posted by NavalFC
This is utter nonsense. You sir, are wrong to the wrongth' degree. Science is ever changing. For example, Einsteins relativity turned the physics world upside down. This idea of science supressing data because they dont want to change anything is bunk, thats how science works, you get data and you make revisions. Science has changed.
As far as stars, they use fusion. That understanding is solid.
Galileo's championing of heliocentrism was controversial within his lifetime, when most subscribed to either geocentrism or the Tychonic system. He met with opposition from astronomers, who doubted heliocentrism due to the absence of an observed stellar parallax. The matter was investigated by the Roman Inquisition in 1615, and they concluded that it could only be supported as a possibility, not as an established fact.Galileo later defended his views in Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, which appeared to attack pope Urban VIII and thus alienated him and the Jesuits, who had both supported Galileo up until this point
He was tried by the Inquisition, found "vehemently suspect of heresy", forced to recant, and spent the rest of his life under house arrest.
It was while Galileo was under house arrest that he wrote one of his finest works, Two New Sciences. Here he summarized the work he had done some forty years earlier, on the two sciences now called kinematics and strength of materials