I seriously debunk this. Debunk it, because it means nothing.

if this isnt faked (and im sure people can verify it)
could this be the end to 911 doubt?
if its real there is no doubt that its inside job

Yeah, it's fake. Whenever they only give you a few seconds, it's fake. Why not show more of the video, ya know? A new angle to an important event would be welcomed, so why not post the WHOLE video from their camera?

Plus whoever shot the footage would have some type of commentary because if this was a real video, it would be the most important video from 911.

Nicely done, but fake.

WOW!

Only took 10 years to nearly the anniversary for this footage to show up...

The video looks legit, watch it a few times and pay attention to the audio, seems like an additional track to me.
Considering the audio seems fake, I'm willing to bet the flashes are too.

Originally posted by OneNationUnder
Whenever they only give you a few seconds, it's fake. Why not show more of the video, ya know? A new angle to an important event would be welcomed, so why not post the WHOLE video from their camera?

Truthers have complained about this for years and have gone as far as applying for freedom of information requests to see more that 10 seconds of the collapse. ect ect. Besides its 5:19, 7 hours after 2 towers fell, your 1997's camcorder batteries were almost dead, you started recording when you heard the booms. This excuse was used with the " 911 from my apartment" video that had many edits during crucial times.

Plus whoever shot the footage would have some type of commentary because if this was a real video, it would be the most important video from 911.
Nicely done, but fake.

They were told the very next day that it fell due to fire, why should the camcorder holder question his government? I am sure there are hundreds of hours of important footage sitting in old dusty tapes that some day will be like Zauprauder x 100 concerning 911

Originally posted by OneNationUnder
Yeah, it's fake. Whenever they only give you a few seconds, it's fake. Why not show more of the video, ya know? A new angle to an important event would be welcomed, so why not post the WHOLE video from their camera?

Plus whoever shot the footage would have some type of commentary because if this was a real video, it would be the most important video from 911.

Nicely done, but fake.

Why play a 10 minute video when the only important part is a few seconds worth?
Short isn't ALWAYS fake.
Who in their right mind would attach themselves to this video, if real, only to get a target on themselves for it whether fake or not?

Kind of a weak baseline to debunking if you ask me.

It would be easy to debunk because we have seen all of the building 7 footage. So if any one can find the same video with out the blast then its a fake.

Real or not. windows 7. i mean building seven, came down just like the others. man made :/

Originally posted by 8ILlBILl8
It would be easy to debunk because we have seen all of the building 7 footage. So if any one can find the same video with out the blast then its a fake.

I cant ever recall seeing this angle before unless they reversed the image to make it appear that it's viewed from a new angle.The other side of the WTC 7 looks like this which should be the side viewed in the video and as you can see it is not. So therefore the video is fake. End of story. See the top?

Are there any serious debunkers here, or just kids crackin wise for stars?
Sometimes I think there would be more intelligent conversations in forums without the desire for a status.

Originally posted by JibbyJedi
Are there any serious debunkers here, or just kids crackin wise for stars?
Sometimes I think there would be more intelligent conversations in forums without the desire for a status.

edit on 14-9-2011 by JibbyJedi because: (no reason given)

Your not debunking it, so your one of those kids?