Subliminal Ron Paul support. ;)

page: 1
2

log in

join

posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 07:38 PM
link   
Here's the wikipedia page on the 2012 presidential primaries.

Wikipedia

Someone added a few sentences, try and find them....

It may or may not have been me.




posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 07:39 PM
link   
you dont have to look far...
its in the first paragraph



posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 07:41 PM
link   
someone deletes it just as fast as i can put it up...



posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 07:46 PM
link   
I got this message about not editing wiki pages



Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write practically anything you want. --William S. Saturn (talk) 00:43, 15 September 2011 (UTC)


this is what i was putting in the article



This presidential primary is one of only a few in history that have one candidate that stands out above the rest, Ron Paul. Ron Paul seems to care more about the American people and supporting the constitution than any of the other candidates. For anyone who loves America, Ron Paul is clearly the best choice at this point in time.



posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 07:50 PM
link   
reply to post by iSHRED
 


Love your avatar. Too bad wiki is so fast on the draw. Remind you of a particular internet forum?
edit on 9/14/2011 by this_is_who_we_are because: typo



posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 08:01 PM
link   
Once I was checking out the wikipedia entry on Blackwater, and in the expanded section there was a line saying how conspiracy theorists are always making up stupid statements, not very non-biased at all, so I edited it to make fun of what they said, sort of like how one person writes on a bathroom wall, and then you write something funny next to it, so it read something like "conspiracy theorists make up lies about Blackwater (kind of like what I'm doing right now)" but lo and behold, in less than a day what I wrote in paranthesis was deleted. And this was in the comments section, not even in the main article. The so called independent wikipedia is completely swamped with these kinds of internet editors. Just another reason not to trust them completely.
edit on 14-9-2011 by filosophia because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 08:38 PM
link   
reply to post by iSHRED
 


You took your piece too far, an entire paragraph within the first paragraph. If you wanted to give Ron Paul a plug, you could've just added self-proclaimed champion of the constitution after they mentioned Ron Paul taking second in the Iowa straw poll. You could've also added that he and bachmann only had a statistical 1% difference.

These are both facts and likely irrefutable by wikipedia.





top topics
 
2

log in

join