It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The oil companies will never allow a PV cell with more than 20% efficiency to reach market. They have a vested interest in keeping us slaves to oil.
Originally posted by Shadowalker
The solar panels have a maximum of efficiency.
Once that maximum is reached it does no good to supply more light. They just need to be made more efficient.
Originally posted by Aim64C
In either case - I recall some of the better solar power systems out there using a set of tracking mirrors to track the sun and then pass it through a lens and onto a small (about three by three centimeter) solar panel - with the mirror system being a square meter or more.
Originally posted by Aim64C
reply to post by gift0fpr0phecy
It was a solar panel. Photovoltaics are more efficient at higher luminous intensities and higher temperatures, generally speaking. Thermovoltaics exist, but require a temperature difference to function, and are therefor impractical in most applications (not to mention their relatively low efficiency - usually such devices, often a Peltier junction, are used as solid-state cooling/heating devices).
Originally posted by mobiusmale
Assuming the angles were right, reflecting light from the opposite roof surface would, indeed, increase the potential electrical output of the PV panels. As opposed to some of the responses here, standard PV panels can and do generate higher outputs as the amount of usable light is directed into them.
The limiter however...and again contrary to some claims made above...is cell temperature. Above about 40 degrees Celsius, cell efficiency begins to drop off dramatically.
Various methods can be used to focus additional light onto a PV cell (including tracking), but over a certain concentration cooling becomes an issue. Without getting into a lot of detail here, there are technologies being developed that focus additional light while not allowing unusable wavelengths from reaching the cell itself (which would only have a heating affect).
There is a completely different kind of solar cell available now, known as a triple-junction cell, that is specifically designed to have much higher concentrations of light trained on them. These cells are typically only about 5 to 10 cm on a side (so, very small compared to standard silicon cells).
There are working systems now available, called CPV (concentrated photovoltaic) in the marketplace that use concentrations of 500 to 1,000 suns...and some coming to market soon that will exceed 1,500 suns. For these systems, cooling is definitely an issue...although not because the cells become inefficient at relatively low temperatures. It is so the cells don't burst into flames or melt.
Typically, these systems use something called a Fresnel Lens to concentrate the sunlight. The cells themselves use a much broader spectrum of light than do PV...and so are far more efficient. PV typically runs at from 11% to 18% efficiency, while CPV cells run at up around 38% to 41% raw efficiency.
CPV, however, does not function well (or nearly at all actually) in diffuse light conditions (like cloudy days)...so is very dependent on annual direct light conditions, and must typically use dual-axis tracking systems to try to keep the solar cells at right angles to the sun throughout the day.
Originally posted by Aim64C
Photovoltaics are more efficient at higher luminous intensities and higher temperatures, generally speaking.
Originally posted by sonofliberty1776
The oil companies will never allow a PV cell with more than 20% efficiency to reach market. They have a vested interest in keeping us slaves to oil.