I notice that non-Christians (a descriptive term, not meant as a slur) appear to be unaware that the word "Christian" is a rather broad label for many variant beliefs. It would be like saying chocolate milk and ice water are identical simply because they are both drinks. (And I don't think that they would mix very well.) There are different writings which are considered holy by different groups. Yes, there is an element of faith involved, but I don't think that blind faith is the best way to describe it. I have faith because what I have read in the Bible -- particularly in the writings of the apostle Paul -- has been verified by experiences in my life. One specific type of experience has happened to me somewhat frequently. I hear/feel/sense (there's not really an appropriate verb for it) that there is a message someone needs to hear, or a scripture they need to read. When I pass along the message, it is just what that person needed to hear. It has occurred too many times to be simple coincidence. However, those experience do correspond with what the scripture says can happen. Call it telepathy if you like, but it does happen, and it verifies the truth of the scripture.

... which has never been answered with actual Evidence or Logic for that matter ...

Uhm..you realize that a belief has hardly anything to do with "Evidence" or "Logic"...but with Faith?

The problem comes then when people try to forcefully construct a "science" (pseudo-science) out of a belief system...eg. trying to establish a "new" science they call "Creationism"..and then THINK (or make it appear so) as if it were equal. (The one born from observation & learning..the other from a belief)

Both are legit on its own by the way..but it should not be MIXED together. Disproving religion with science is dumb..so is disproving or doubting science because of a belief. (And every time those two came together in the past..well it turned out BAD)