It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by yes4141
reply to post by malachi777
Wow, no need to be so apologetic or so socially apprehensive! It's about you, you can joke if you wish to!
I don't quite understand what you mean by "disappeared"- all I can think of is those tribes who supposedly 'invert' their penis'. Not quite sure about the logistics...
Originally posted by MamaJ
Originally posted by jed001
reply to post by RevelationGeneration
where does god live, show me GOD . no one has ever been able to show me scientific prrof of god. a belief in god is a wonderful if it helps you with your fear of the after life but please donot confuse it with facts
BUT,,what "facts" are you referring to?
Can you prove there is NO God?
Some believing in a creator may not be out of "fear"....how can you claim that when you are not even a believer?
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by Zeer0
Thanks but the Fossil Record is not scientific method science, it's purely speculative because its not observable, repeatable, or refutable and thus does not qualify as either a scientific fact or theory. Sounds like a faith to me?
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by Youji69
So there's nothing actually observable? We have to just believe that one fossil became another without seeing it happen? I know its supposed to take "millions and millions of years" but if that's the case wouldn't we see animals even today evolving and becoming a knew kind? How come we never see this? I think it takes alot of faith to believe one animal genus became another with no one ever seeing it happen.
II. ARCHAEOLOGY AND SCIENCE Having completed the survey of scientific principles, the examination of archaeological data, as seen in the light of these principles, now comes under consideration. The problem awaiting solution is as follows: Do archaeological data lend themselves to scientific treatment? In answering this question it will be necessary to apply archaeological finds to the principles of scientific method. If archaeological facts are amenable to scientific treatment, then our question as to whether or not archaeology can be recognized as a full-fledged science will have been answered.
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
So how cant that be the case if the animal is dead before it ever get's time to "evolve"???
KENT, Ohio, Oct. 1 (UPI) -- A U.S. biological anthropologist says he's determined humans did not evolve from apes, but, rather, apes evolved from humans. Kent State University Professor C. Owen Lovejoy, who specializes in the study of human origins, said his findings came from a study of Ardipithecus ramidus, a hominid species that lived 4.4 million years ago in what now is Ethiopia.
Originally posted by JewInIsrael
For over 1500 generations, fruit flies have been subjected to radiation and chemicals.4 This caused mutations in the flies. If you take a human generation to be 25 years, this is equal to around 37 500 years (1500 x 25) in human terms.
What happened to these mutated flies over this time? Firstly, they were still flies and had not evolved into anything else! Secondly the flies as a population were worse off with many dying, having curly wings or stubby wings.
It is amazing that evolutionists would put forward mutations as the mechanism by which evolution could somehow take place!
second : the lack of intermediate or transitional fossils , which mean that the claim that evolutionist people say that birds came from reptiles , LOL !! , this claim imply that you should find hundreds if not thousands of fossils that has shared characteristics between birds and reptiles and show the gradual evolution of reptiles into birds over time but no fossil has ever been found having a half-scale/half-wing or any fossil , in other words many transitional life forms would have existed between the ancestor and the descendants time if evolution was true . but Now, after 150 years of searching for fossils since Darwin, almost no transitional fossils have been found of among the millions of fossils collected.!! and please don't mention the feathered dinosaurs chinese origins fossils , first one was prove to be fake so i don't trust any fossil from Chinese sources
the big nail in evolution coffin is what called in Paleontology science the "Cambrian Explosion", i will tell you what is "Cambrian Explosion" : it is the apparently rapid appearance of most major groups of complex animals around 530 million years ago, as evidenced by the fossil records.This was accompanied by a major diversification of other organisms, including animals, phytoplankton, and calcimicrobes.
fourth : the pure simple logical argument that : NON living things don't produce Living things and no human with reasonable mind power can deny this .
evolution is the biggest lie in human history
first : the first logical question for evolutionist guys is that how evolution happen , what is the mechanism for evolution to happen in life forms ?
there answer probably will be : Mutations
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by john_bmth
So i ask a simple question, which should be easy for you to answer as many of you claim creation is just a myth and evolution is a fact, yet you cannot even provide one piece of proof that any genus has become a new kind of animal, then you expect me to believe we can from a fish, then an ape like ancestor etc...?
Incredible.