It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Yesterday I spent more than two hours watching, and live-blogging, the Congressional oversight committee hearing on bankrupt solar start-up Solyndra. When it was over, I felt as if I had wasted two hours on a Jersey Shore marathon: Dirty, unfulfilled and angry (both at myself for watching, and at those who gave me something to watch).
To be sure, I had expected lots of self-serving statements that could have been entered into the record without being verbalized (gotta get that sound bite). And of course there would be talk of whether only one president (Obama) or two presidents (Obama and Bush) were to blame for loaning Solyndra $535 million of taxpayer money, plus questions of political pressure (most of which seemed to revolve around the timing of the loan's close, rather than its approval).
But I also had hoped for a detailed analysis of Solyndra itself – particularly its business model. Was the company, as it has argued, a victim of collapsing global solar prices (spurred by Chinese subsidies and the European financial crisis)? Or was it the victim of its own hubris – believing that customers would pay massive up-front costs for long-term savings? Or a combination of both? And, whatever the resolution – was such an outcome foreseeable?
Finally, why did VCs keep investing in the company in late 2008 – considering that Silver claimed the company would have failed without the early 2009 loan? Did they have good reason to believe DoE had come around, or was it evidence that lots of bad money followed honest intentions?
Unfortunately, virtually none of the substantive issues were discussed.
DoE loan program chair Jonathan Silver -- an ex-VC, even though it seems few committee members cared to read his resume -- pressed the solar price case, which was echoed by certain Democratic committee members, but never was asked to talk much about Solyndra specifically. Most of the Republicans simply wanted to make speeches and insinuations. The worst offender was chair Cliff Stearns (R-FL), who kept preventing Silver from answering what Stearn apparently felt were rhetorical questions.
At least Phil Gingrey (R-GA) had some queries about the legality of DoE restructuring the Solyndra loan with a private debt investor who got seniority – it had been approved by DoE and OMB counsel -- although he only did so for the purpose of arguing its illegality (again, sound bite).
My takeaway: This committee – both sides -- is not serious about finding out what really went wrong with Solyndra, thus perhaps improving the DoE loan program going forward. Its primary concern is scoring political points. And it didn't even do that very well…
Originally posted by jibeho
This image gives you an idea about what Solyndra was up against in regards to competition from the Chinese. This is not new information and just adds further to the notion that this deal was doomed from the start. How can any company successfully compete with China on its own? I am not advocating govt. support for this either maybe we just need tougher trade guidelines with China. Never happen though. The own the majority of our debt. So, we're screwed by the Chinese and the Nimrods in DC.
Here is a blogger trying to keep up with the play by play in these hearings. This is from yesterday
finance.fortune.cnn.com...edit on 15-9-2011 by jibeho because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Jakes51
The Holder Justice Department will have to respond to this scandal. Even if it affects his apparent lock-step relationship with the White House. Those emails appear to be direct collusion between an apparent shake and bake company and the White House to defraud the taxpayer of nearly a billion dollars? I suppose the only "green," anyone ever saw from this was the color of money?
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by Indigo5
Originally posted by centurion1211
Solyndra was approved in a very fast and furious manner only a couple weeks after the Bush administration had said no.
edit on 9/14/2011 by centurion1211 because: (no reason given)
Wow...False on both counts. You know you can knock the POTUS without outright BSing?
On Solyndra-gate, cherry pick the news all you want to try and salvage obama's reputation (yet again - getting to be a habit with you), but the facts are the facts.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Fact: The application was turned down under the Bush administration.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Fact: The application was approved under the obama administration - after multiple visits to the White House by a key Solyndra-gate investor who also was a big obama campaign donor.. Can you say QUID PRO QUO?
Originally posted by centurion1211
Fact: Multiple financial people that reviewed the business model said it wouldn't work. Because - and pay close attention here - you can't make a solar panel for $6/watt and sell it for $3/watt.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Some people will beat a dead horse,
Originally posted by Indigo5
You think 17 Million was important to that man????
.
I am pretty sure where the GOP and yourselves would like to keep the headlines.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by Indigo5
You think 17 Million was important to that man????
Just one example from you.
Not even a fact.
edit on 9/15/2011 by centurion1211 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Alxandro
I have a question for the Obama supporters.
Why is it that the so called "most intelligent man to ever be President" was not even smart enough to realize what the so called "most dumbest man to ever be President" knew immediately,that this green company was doomed to fail?
Originally posted by Alxandro
I have a question for the Obama supporters.
Why is it that the so called "most intelligent man to ever be President" was not even smart enough to realize what the so called "most dumbest man to ever be President" knew immediately,that this green company was doomed to fail?
Originally posted by Indigo5
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by Indigo5
You think 17 Million was important to that man????
Just one example from you.
Not even a fact.
edit on 9/15/2011 by centurion1211 because: (no reason given)
Sure it is.
Originally posted by Alxandro
I have a question for the Obama supporters.
Why is it that the so called "most intelligent man to ever be President" was not even smart enough to realize what the so called "most dumbest man to ever be President" knew immediately,that this green company was doomed to fail?
January 2009: In an effort to show it has done something to support renewable energy, the Bush Administration tries to take Solyndra before a DOE credit review committee before President Obama is inaugurated. The committee, consisting of career civil servants with financial expertise, remands the loan back to DOE “without prejudice” because it wasn’t ready for conditional commitment.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Poor logic at best.
Originally posted by Indigo5
I have a question for Obama haters...
Must you always lie when Attacking the President?
The Bush Administration tried desperately to fast-track this loan.