It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Flyer
reply to post by Domo1
Its happened plenty of times before, they turn up and say youve threatened the president.
Its pretty clear to me he went over the line. In no way is that acceptable behaviour and its certainly offensive and the country is better for not allowing it.
Originally posted by Flyer
reply to post by Slavich
He is a criminal, what he did is against the law. He probably doesnt even have a job anyway.
So youd rather someone do that and youd have to have a fight than not have them do it at all, that makes no sense.
Originally posted by Domo1
reply to post by TRiPWiRE
There are cases of people committing suicide (such as one of his "targets"), because of internet bullying etc.
They win the Darwin Award in my opinion. Getting trolled on the internet? Stop going on the freaking internet.edit on 13-9-2011 by Domo1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Flyer
reply to post by Slavich
That wouldnt happen because theres no way Id go that far.
Theres only been a handful of cases like this and its only in extreme cases.
We dont have free speech and we dont have nutcases like westboro. The US doesnt have free speech and they encourage Westboro thinking it means they keep free speech.
I know which one is better.
French defamation laws historically have been more severe. An act of 1881, which inaugurated modern French defamation law, required conspicuous retraction ...
However, Adam Gropnik does a nice job pointing out how French defamation and privacy laws are to blame for keeping news reporters from really discussing DSK's questionable activities in the past. In fact, a few years back, DSK made it clear that he would sue anyone who spread "rumors" about his personal life. In conjunction with stories of super injunctions in the UK and Max Mosley's now failed attempt to expand privacy laws in Europe to protect famous people from having their private lives displayed in the newspapers, it begins to raise some serious questions.
Lots of people sympathize with the basic argument that your private life is private, and it seems unfair to have private affairs spread across the news. And yet, if someone really is doing something egregious -- or potentially harmful -- is seeking to gag the press and others from making that information public only giving them cover to progress further and commit potentially heinous acts?
Originally posted by Flyer
reply to post by Slavich
Victimless crime? Try telling the parents of the child that.
So their internet useage should be dictated by bullies? Thats not really very fair. Everyone should be able to use it without some fat idiot posting threats and intimidating.
Go and insult a cop or try flying abroad and see how free you really are.