Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

CIA Threatens "9/11:Press for Truth".

page: 2
24
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on Sep, 13 2011 @ 08:12 PM
link   
reply to post by phishyblankwaters
 
They should be exposed due to their negligence.Seems like a fair price to pay for that day.Any of you ever stop to think the reason that the Agency is going after these guys is because of Press for Truth? that Doc did not exactly show the US intel community in a good light.




posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 04:29 PM
link   
I think Clarke is providing disinformation to the people interviewing him in the video. He is making it look like the CIA was concealing the identities of two of the "hijackers" because the agency was engaged in poaching for double agents on FBI turf. But these two objects of CIA interest were already known to an FBI asset.

They didn't need the CIA's help on this. They just had to manage their asset properly and make sure they knew who he was talking to, meeting with and living with.

Did they do this? The FBI agent involved says the asset was not completely forthcoming. Well that settles the matter then . . . on Sesame St.

www.historycommons.org...


Best Chance to Stop the 9/11 Plot? - The FBI will later conclude that Shaikh is not involved in the 9/11 plot, but it has serious doubts about his credibility. After 9/11 he will give inaccurate information and has an “inconclusive” polygraph examination about his foreknowledge of the 9/11 attack. The FBI will believe he had contact with another of the 9/11 hijackers, Hani Hanjour, but claimed not to recognize him. There will be other “significant inconsistencies” in Shaikh’s statements about the hijackers, including when he first met them and his later meetings with them. The 9/11 Congressional Inquiry will conclude that had the asset’s contacts with the hijackers been capitalized upon, it “would have given the San Diego FBI field office perhaps the US intelligence community’s best chance to unravel the September 11 plot.” [US Congress, 7/24/2003, pp. 51 ] The FBI will try to prevent Butler and Shaikh from testifying before the 9/11 Congressional Inquiry in October 2002. Butler will end up testifying (see October 9, 2002), but Shaikh will not (see October 5, 2002). [Washington Post, 10/11/2002]
Entity Tags: Hani Hanjour, Khalid Almihdhar, Omar al-Bayoumi, Osama (“Sam”) Mustafa, Nawaf Alhazmi, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Steven Butler, Abdussattar Shaikh
Timeline Tags: Complete 911 Timeline, 9/11 Timeline


People aren't buying this crap.
edit on 14-9-2011 by ipsedixit because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 05:00 PM
link   
From the description attached to the video embedded below.


David Graham, a dentist from Louisiana, stumbled onto the path of three 9/11 hijackers 10 months before the attacks. Graham reported his encounter several times to the FBI but never heard back. In September 2006 he died under highly suspicious circumstances.


Two of the hijackers Graham met are the same two "potential double agents" referred to by Richard Clarke in the video interview embedded above, al Hazmi and Almihdhar.

In the video below Graham describes a conversation which took place in his presence which he "wasn't supposed to hear."


Graham tells about what he wasn't supposed to hear at the 3:00 minute mark of the clip.



The two "al Qaeda operatives" let slip in front of a total stranger, that they were connected to Osama bin Laden.

This was no slip. They were building a legend, a fake story about who they were. Just as General Ahmad was doing when he arranged for an al Qaeda operative to wire Mohammed Atta 100,000 dollars and thus create a credible connection between Atta and al Qaeda money. Al Qaeda money = Osama bin Laden (at that time).

The 9/11 insiders are still inside and they are still playing games with the public.



posted on Sep, 14 2011 @ 11:54 PM
link   
This dentist, Graham, who was also a talk show host and an investigative reporter is one of the biggest heroes of the 9/11 story.

His story of how he met the two "hijackers" reeks of a set up. He is the perfect sort of individual to have come forward, after the attack had happened, and say, "I met two of those guys. They said they were connected to Osama bin Laden."

It would have suited the 9/11 perps perfectly to have this kind of corroberation of the official story appear from an innocent source like him.

Instead, he immediately upon suspecting a terrorist connection, took his story to the congressional authorities. That forced them to sit on it and obfuscate, or muddy the waters.

He began to realize that he was in deep water after the 9/11 attack when he realized that the two people he met were being connected to the attack by the authorities.

He then did a very prudent thing. He wrote a small book about what had happened to him and left a video will, setting forth the essence of his story.

That is the only reason we know that al Hazmi and Almihdhar were trying to make Graham believe they were connected to bin Laden and the only reason we know for sure that Congressional authorities knew who these people were, knew they represented themselves as connected to bin Laden and did nothing about them.

A fact that strongly suggests that 9/11 was an operation steered from within the Beltway.

Graham payed with his life for his heroism. Louisiana should name a freeway after him.



posted on Jul, 21 2012 @ 03:39 PM
link   
Press for truth is an amazing video!

It does seem that the CIA were trying to cover their tracks. Their behaviour on this is very revealing. Mind you, the video 'Press for truth' is probably one of the most damning videos out there, and I bet they are not happy that it exists.




Bush comes across as one would expect, this video reveals a lot about him and his people.






top topics
 
24
<< 1   >>

log in

join