It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by Greatest I am
A moral God would grant us the freedom to choose, and ask us to step up to OUR responsibilities.
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by Greatest I am
I think you misunderstand the nature of Jesus' Magnum Opus or "Great Work", as the taking of a stand in the name of Love (it must somehow be seen from his perspective), without compromise.
Modern American Conservative Chuchianity is probably so far off the mark, that if Jesus himself entered their church and started speaking to them, they're throw him out on his ass, or, if they didn't, refuse to stop crawling around on the ground at his feet when all he wanted to do was enjoy their company!
Originally posted by Greatest I am
Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by Greatest I am
I think it might be wrong to think of God in terms of some ethereal being who is omnipresent and able to see, determine or even care about everything that goes on on the planet when maybe God was a highly evolved guy who visited once and knocked up a few of the local girls and they still tell stories about him. Oh yes...he will be back, he said he was coming back.
I mean I am not saying it happened that way but God might be the distillation of what was a great race of people once here and now either assimilated into the population. The leader El or Yahweh whatever you want to call him might be coming back or might have moved on.
Or most likely never existed in the first place.
Regards
DL
Jesus' rhetoric, as written by man, is quite easy to understand. If we recognize how useless rhetoric can be.
Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by Greatest I am
Jesus' rhetoric, as written by man, is quite easy to understand. If we recognize how useless rhetoric can be.
Jesus rhetoric was not useless and is the only one that will work on this planet. The rest even "live and let live" have shortcomings where they become useless and unworkable due to the natures of man. Other than Buddha (a similar Christ consciousness) you will not find mortals saying "love your enemies" and "turn the other cheek." You will not find a doctrine so heavy on forgiveness, selfless and gains nothing (tithing is made up by man to support the Church) If Christ consciousness were prevalent there would be no war, no killing and none of the hatred, not even yours, everyone WOULD treat other people as they would like to be treated. Perfection would reign. One day it will. People will understand and adjust.edit on 14-9-2011 by newcovenant because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by Greatest I am
Uh actually...no I don't. I don't study you. I am happy you learned a new word though. Maybe try another.
Originally posted by Greatest I am
Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by Greatest I am
Jesus' rhetoric, as written by man, is quite easy to understand. If we recognize how useless rhetoric can be.
Jesus rhetoric was not useless and is the only one that will work on this planet. The rest even "live and let live" have shortcomings where they become useless and unworkable due to the natures of man. Other than Buddha (a similar Christ consciousness) you will not find mortals saying "love your enemies" and "turn the other cheek." You will not find a doctrine so heavy on forgiveness, selfless and gains nothing (tithing is made up by man to support the Church) If Christ consciousness were prevalent there would be no war, no killing and none of the hatred, not even yours, everyone WOULD treat other people as they would like to be treated. Perfection would reign. One day it will. People will understand and adjust.edit on 14-9-2011 by newcovenant because: (no reason given)
Thanks for the rhetoric.
You already know what I think of rhetoric.
Regards
DL
Originally posted by newcovenant
[
You confuse good ideas and lifesaving prescriptions for humanity and life on the planet, with rhetoric.
Solutions and commands (from your maker) no matter how unreasonable and impossible they may seem initially, should be tried, and they never have. ]
Originally posted by XplanetX
reply to post by Greatest I am
The question should be:
Will immoral men and women step up and accept God into their hearts and change?
God has done his part:
JN 3:16 "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God's one and only Son. This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but men loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that his deeds will be exposed. But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what he has done has been done through God."
Originally posted by Greatest I am
Originally posted by newcovenant
[
You confuse good ideas and lifesaving prescriptions for humanity and life on the planet, with rhetoric.
Solutions and commands (from your maker) no matter how unreasonable and impossible they may seem initially, should be tried, and they never have. ]
Well, if the maker cared at all about us, he would be here to give clear commands and suggestions and not rely an a book of myths.
Unless of course you think a book that begins with 2 creation stories, has a talking snake at the beginning and a seven headed monster at the end, is not a book of fantasy, miracles and magic.
Did I mention that it also has a God who seems to think it a good idea to have his son murdered when he had no need to.
Regards
DL
Well, if the maker cared at all about us, he would be here to give clear commands and suggestions and not rely an a book of myths.
Did I mention that it also has a God who seems to think it a good idea to have his son murdered when he had no need to.
You already know what I think of rhetoric.
It's not.
What if death is freaking awesome?
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by newcovenant
It's not.
What if death is freaking awesome?
Acts 2:24
But God raised him up, having released him from the pains of death, because it was not possible for him to be held in its power.
edit to add: speaking of Jesus' blood (Hebrews 9:14), it says it will cleanse the conscience of our company of dead works to serve God living. That is the literal translation. Does the writer mean, living God? There would probably be a, the, in front of God, if that was the intended meaning. The order and case of the word, living, indicates it is being used to describe how something is done, so you should most likely (and it makes a good comparison to the earlier part that says something about a freedom from dead works) read it to mean, to serve God in a living way.edit on 24-9-2011 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)