My End Arguement In Regards to 9/11. This is what being Most Powerful, "Free" Nation Means., page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 12-9-2011 @ 09:29 AM by Myendica
reply to post by binkbonk


it sure looks that way. But even if it wasnt, they should still all be fired and detained.. Testimonies should be mandatory underoath.


reply posted on 12-9-2011 @ 09:45 AM by phishyblankwaters
reply to post by samkent




how do you get fighters on scene and identify exactly which aircraft is the next one to strike a building,


the same way it's always done, the instant a jet moves off course and turns it's transponder off (it can STILL be tracked) it's considered a hijack situation. communication would be attempted with any jets not following orders, probably a warning with a time frame would be issued, then the jets would be shot down trying to limit collateral damage (before they are physically over the city)

air traffic control knew there was a problem within minutes. with the countless drills being run, people were actually wondering if it was real or simulation, which caused delays. As well, they changed the order of command to require someone at the white house (Cheney I think) to actually give the order, and he was incognito. This has since been changed back to the old ways as far as I know.

Once the first hijacked plane slammed into the building there should have been little room to question, any flights not responding, and moving off course, should have been shot down.

They weren't. And in fact, the scrambled the jets too late and from the wrong air field and sent them in the WRONG direction.

I saw a video recently that shows the flight path these fighters took and it's extremely questionable.


reply posted on 12-9-2011 @ 09:47 AM by samkent
reply to post by Myendica




A plane ever hitting a building, on a clear day, should always be seen as something more.


Planes hit plane on clear days.
Pilots have heart attacks.
Planes have system failures.

Hijacked planes can have mishaps. That doesn't or didn't mean it was an intentional attack on that day.

That's like saying you should have changed that light bulb the day before it burned out just because you knew its time was near. Or police should prevent bank robberies because they know it's about time.
You can't know what's in the minds of man.


reply posted on 12-9-2011 @ 09:50 AM by Myendica
reply to post by samkent


the "fog of war" excuse is just that, an excuse. Once everyone is forced to give testimony, the real information will be available. The plan was executed because those in charge failed to fulfill their duties. We had the intel, and they failed. So they should be detained, questioned, and possibly prosecuted.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 13 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 5 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 15 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 9 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 17 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 19 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 9 days ago with 8 member flags