reply to post by captainnotsoobvious
Nice try, but you've resorted to the same old straw man claiming the truthers say something they don't.
1. No other building ever collapsed from fire
Who said that? you sir and only you. A fact, though, is that no STEEL FRAMED SKYSCRAPER HAS COLLAPSED DUE TO FIRE. I won't bother sourcing that
fact as you didn't bother sourcing your propaganda.
No one saw or heard hundreds of timed explosions
no one except the first responder fire fighters and police which is recorded for posterity in plenty of videos as well as audio recordings of the
dispact frequency, you can even go read the entire 911 transcripts that are time stamped that show all of these people reporting plenty of explosions.
One fire fighter featured in almost every 911 docu reported a series of explosions rippling down the building like machine gun fire.
The French use a demo technique, that doesn't use explosives, but does use the weight of upper floors to crush the lower floors. And guess what, a
building destroyed this way looks EXACTLY like the Twin Towers.
that's called a gravity fueled collapse. And guess what? It requires shape charges to destroy the core columns of a building to remove any
resistance, timed in a fashion to allow gravity to pull the building down into itself. No demolition consists of "blowing up" a building, they are
rely on gravity, but for this resistance must be removed, which is the core issue with the collapse of the twin towers and WTC7 specifically.
Building 7 only had a few fires
Sorry I'll believe the videos and the word of the fire fighters tasked with entering and securing the building over your un-sourced opinion. Many
media reported the limited fires WTC7 endured and you can see various videos of this.
No one saw a plane at the Pentagon
Only idiot disinfo plants say that crap, plenty of people saw a plane hit the pentagon, a massive hole was visible before the facade collapsed, plenty
of debris was around as well. Have to agree with you on this point.
Richard Gage is an honest guy
He doesn't have to be honest, the facts and physics speak for themselves. BUT, if it's character assassination time, well, almost everyone involved
with the official story could be called into question. Hell, the very people that wrote the very report you take as truth say it's factually
inaccurate and there was an effort within the government to withhold information from them relating to the attack. Their words.
The Pentagon had a missile defense system - NOT TRUE
Another claim I have yet to hear come from a "truther". Now plenty of people, rightfully so, ask how some of the most protected air space in north
America was breached, but this doesn't insinuate missile defense arrays around the pentagon. And lets not forget Minettas testimony, too convenient
to forget that I think.
So you wanna call truthers out? I wanna call people like you out. Putting words in our mouths then "debunking" them is one thing, and a pretty
pathetic tactic if you ask me, but just flat out saying "not true" with nothing to back it up.
That, my friend, is the epitome of a troll. Well done.
I'm sure all the families who lost people on 911, you know, the families that STARTED THE TRUTHER MOVEMENT, appreciate your tact and
edit on 12-9-2011 by phishyblankwaters because: (no reason given)