It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by pstrron
Ya think??? I have to admit, you made my day. Now if the people could only get their hands on those that committed this crime, I'm sure someone could find a tall tree and a short rope.
Originally posted by Saltarello
Originally posted by trebor451
Originally posted by TupacShakur
reply to post by LunchBocks
Hey man thank Richard Gage and AE911Truth, the majority of the info is just transferred from the film onto the website for the sake of convenience and time. They also put out another documentary, Experts Speak Out, two days ago and I might make a thread about that one too depending on what information they include.
Damn, thats gotta be one of the best researched and thought out threads I've seen in a long while. I posted a link to this thread on FB so I could provide some support to my thoughts to my friends. This deserves so many flags and stars.
I'm sorry. I cannot go along with the dead rapper and Gage's thesis. He left out any reference to the Sta-Puff Marshmallow man, which has every right to be considered as a source for the tower collapses as Gage's and his pile of monkey poop.
Not to mention Mothman and the Penguin and Lex Luthor, all of whom are more than slightly miffed that they are not given credit by Gage.
Seriously...if there was one shred of an iota of evidence that what Gage says is even remotely connected to the truth, why, in the 10 years since, has nothing been done about it with the exception of Gage lining his pockets with money that fools like you (and the dead rapper) keep sending him? A fool and his money are soon parted, while Gage gets to keep avoiding a real job.
In any event, keep up the good work! I love these chuckles that take you a day and a half to throw together - it keeps you off the streets, which can only be a good thing.
Clearest example that ignorance (or more like being a total retard) is bliss. That goes to those that try to argue not even looking at the facts.
Oh I see when somebody disagrees with you they are, and I quote "a total retard".
Here's three facts which you will not like :
1. Last night I watched 9/11 stuff some of which of which was video footage like the one taken by the french crew doing a fire service documentary. The camerman had run like f.... whilst tower 2 collapsed, he was still filming. There was no "explosion". There was the load noise of a building collapsing !!
2. Here in the UK around 50% of the population will tell you about the video footage of the bomber on the bus (our 7/7). No such footage exists, it's all false memories provoked by press coverege , extrapolation and different inside bus footage. Peoples memories are highly prone to false recollection.
3. Psychologists interviewed people, at the time, who were present at 9/11 and asked them for detailed rec ollections. Three years later they were asked the same questions 40% HAD A DIFFERENT RECOLLECTION !! They are about to re-interview the same people to see what 10 years does to the memory.
So the so called "facts" about explosions are not "facts" are they.?..You absolutely CANNOT use peoples recollections as fact even with something as unforgettable as this event.
Now those videos came out with something most odd: Fireman searching for bodies stated that amongst the rubble there was not a single desk, cupboard , chair, computer, phone.....nothing. The largest piece (of a phone) he had found was no more than 2 inches long. basically the building and the contents had been pulverised, which includes the bodies, unfortunately, hence why they so many were never found.
So think carefully about this. Even if the building was purposely exploded the resulting destruction was most unusual and not at all like any building demolition I have ever seen! It therefore seems to me that people should be concentrating on this aspect to determine what forces were present to pulverise a building like that. I suspect it;s outside steel earthquake resistant frame acted as a cage which reflected and held (by design a cage!) all the destructive force inwards and you had a large tube whose full destructive force was feeding back on itself. The outside cage would cause the building to collapse inwards no matter what the trigger.
So additional fact : The resulting destruction was very odd even if purposely detontated and suggests its unusual construction had more to do with how it collapsed.
Another Fact : That very same destruction, even if on purpose, created powdered concrete and glass. There is no need to invent additional fanciful reasons for respiratory problems of anybody having breathed that in.