Taliban Denies Any Involvement in the 9/11 Attacks, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times
Topic started on 11-9-2011 @ 12:24 PM by deadmessiah
Some breaking news here:


As the world geared up to remember the Sept. 11 terror attacks, a powerful Taliban truck bomb exploded at a U.S. military base in Afghanistan late Saturday, wounding 77 American soldiers and killing five Afghan civilians, including a three-year-old girl. The attack came shortly after the Taliban issued a statement vowing to send American forces "to the dustbin of history." In the statement, the Taliban also promised to keep fighting U.S. forces until all American troops leave Afghanistan, but they denied any involvement in the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on the United States.
No American soldiers were killed in the attack, carried out by a suicide bomber who detonated a large bomb inside a truck carrying firewood. NATO reported Sunday that none of the 77 injuries is considered life-threatening.

Officials said no other international troops were stationed at the base, Combat Outpost Sayed Abad in Wardak province.

But the attack provided a vivid reminder that the decade-old Afghan war still rages. In an email to the media on Saturday, the Taliban accused the United States of using the Sept. 11 attacks as a pretext to invade Afghanistan and said the international community was responsible for killing thousands of Afghans during the invasion and occupation.

"Each year, 9/11 reminds the Afghans of an event in which they had no role whatsoever," the Taliban said in the email. "American colonialism has shed the blood of tens of thousands of miserable and innocent Afghans."

Rest of the article:
www.ctv.ca...

Don't you find that all a bit weird? IIRC, the msm is always publishing articles in which the Taliban claim to have been behind the 9/11 attacks. Now all of a sudden, they publish an article where the Taliban denies involvement? What do you debunkers have to say about that? The people the U.S. government blames as behind the attacks is denying any involvement.


reply posted on 11-9-2011 @ 12:37 PM by deadmessiah
Another tidbit of info some of you may not be aware of already:



On October 4, 2001, British Prime Minister Tony Blair released information compiled by Western intelligence agencies connecting Osama bin Laden to the Afghanistan's Taliban leadership as well as being the leader of the al-Qaeda organization. The Taliban government gave safe haven to Osama bin Laden in the years leading up to the attack, and his al-Qaeda network may have had a close relationship with the Taliban army and police[citation needed]. On the day of 9/11, the Taliban foreign minister told the Arab television network Al Jazeera: "We denounce this terrorist attack, whoever is behind it."

The United States requested the Taliban to shut down all al-Qaeda bases in Afghanistan, open them to inspection and turn over Osama bin Laden. The Taliban refused all these requests. Instead they offered to extradite Osama bin Laden to an Islamic country, for trial under Islamic law, if the United States presented evidence of his guilt. The Taliban had previously refused to extradite bin Laden to the United States, or prosecute him, after he was indicted by the US federal courts for involvement in the 1998 United States embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania.

The Taliban deemed eyewitness testimony and satellite phone call recordings entered in the public record in February 2001 during a trial as insufficient grounds to extradite bin Laden for his involvement in the bombings. Invoking the Bush Doctrine, which stated "We will make no distinction between the terrorists and those who harbor them", the United States and Britain invaded and overthrew the Taliban regime in 2001, using air power, special forces and the Northern Alliance as a land army. On November 29, 2007 a videotape was released that The Central Intelligence Agency says is likely to be from Osama bin Laden. In it the speaker claims sole responsibility for the attacks and specifically denies any prior knowledge of them by The Taliban or the Afghan people.
-
en.wikipedia.org...

This is the same as the police killing the family of a criminal because they let him stay in their house. Actually, its worse. Had the police given the family evidence that the man was a criminal, they would have turned him over.


reply posted on 11-9-2011 @ 12:46 PM by deadmessiah
reply to post by WhoDat09



The problem is that we're fighting the Taliban, not Al Qaeda. The Taliban is not at fault, yet we're killing them and the Afghan people anyways. So when the Taliban retaliates, its not the "work of Al Qaeda" like they love to say. Its the Taliban tired of all our senseless killing. As of 2001, the size of Al Qaeda was 500 - 1000 people. Since 2001, we've killed well over a million people. Think we might have gotten them all by now?

The people our government blamed for the attacks aren't the one's we're fighting. It would be like the Taliban claiming our Military committed a terror attack against them, and in retaliation, attacked our state side militias.


reply posted on 11-9-2011 @ 01:27 PM by mobiusmale
Originally posted by deadmessiah
reply to
post by WhoDat09



The problem is that we're fighting the Taliban, not Al Qaeda. The Taliban is not at fault, yet we're killing them and the Afghan people anyways. So when the Taliban retaliates, its not the "work of Al Qaeda" like they love to say. Its the Taliban tired of all our senseless killing. As of 2001, the size of Al Qaeda was 500 - 1000 people. Since 2001, we've killed well over a million people. Think we might have gotten them all by now?

The people our government blamed for the attacks aren't the one's we're fighting. It would be like the Taliban claiming our Military committed a terror attack against them, and in retaliation, attacked our state side militias.


It's great when we can just throw inflammatory numbers around without any proof...or common sense in this case. I have searched high and low and cannot come up with an estimate of civilian deaths that comes anywhere near "over a million people". Maybe the number in Afghanistan is closer to 20,000...maybe.

www.abc.net.au...

And interestingly...the Taliban is responsible for the lion's share of these deaths...

Insurgents were linked to 75 per cent of civilian deaths and 16 per cent were attributed to foreign and government forces, according to the annual report released with the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission.


As they were responsible for thousands of civilian deaths prior to invasion.

Stop glamorizing these mass murderers as some kind of liberating champions of the Afghan people.

The Taliban harboured and sheltered Al Qaeda. They were given a deadline to hand over Bin Laden.. They did not. They were ousted.

Al Qaeda was routed in the process and driven out of Afghansitan. Coalition combat forces would likely be long gone by now, if not for the Taliban's on-going campaign of murder and mayhem.

The only reason the Taliban is still around is because of Coalition rules of engagement that prevent us from going all out to destroy them - because doing so would cause additional civilian casualties!

We do all that we can to protect civilian lives...the Taliban goes out of their way to inflict civilian deaths.

Your argument is totally upside down and backwards.


reply posted on 11-9-2011 @ 02:29 PM by sk0rpi0n
reply to post by mobiusmale




The only reason the Taliban is still around is because of Coalition rules of engagement that prevent us from going all out to destroy them - because doing so would cause additional civilian casualties!


Or maybe, its because the Taliban know how to fight? ]

Civilian casualties? Oh, thats happened a lot from the beginning of the war... they all just get written off as "collateral damage". No biggie.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 13 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 5 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 15 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 9 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 17 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 19 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 9 days ago with 8 member flags