reply to post by purplemer
That is one lame duck excuse...
That's your opinion, I oppose violent fascist regimes, I oppose unarmed civilian death, whether it's in my country, or someone elses, I respect the
Geneva Convention and i will oppose those who do not abide by it. Even my own country.
If you do not tolerate the needless blowing up of children. Why do you bomb cities and why do non hostile deaths exceed combative
I don't bomb anyone, I would rather see people it foreign countries being properly educated, being allowed the freedom to support the goverment they
want, and not letting a small group of radicalised theocrats scare them into submission. I support a war of attrition, but not towards unarmed
Why did you start two wars that you never had the legitimate authority to start. Neither of which were never ratified under the united nations
and therefore illegal.
I didn't start anything. There may have been no evidence for WMDs but I'd rather see theocratic facshist regimes destroyed before they consume the
good people of their country, or neighbouring countries.
If you care so much for human life, why do you have such disregard for the geneva convention and international laws that where put in place to
stop the type of massacre that the USA is now interjecting upon the middle east.
Again, i support the Geneva Convention, but there is evidence of other countries not holding true to that, and I won't support the appeasement of such
regimes, as Hitler was appeased before he invaded Poland.
Protect civilians in the own country....! Killing the civilians is the most perverse form of protection I have ever heard of.
Then maybe you should start opposing theocratic radicals who blow up children and other civilians.
Please care to eleborate how you are caring for 600,000 men., women and children that have died in Iraq alone between 2003-2006...
50 to 70 million died in World War 2. Do you care for them? What about the Nazi soldiers? Do you care for them?
What would you have done? Left Hitler to his own devices? The allied forces wern't intending to blow up nations or civilians.
[Do you know there were not suicide attacks in Iraq before the occupation started. What kind of delusional trickery would make one think they
are protecting the citizens from these attacks when they are actually the cause of them..
Yes, their has always been terrorists. It was wrong of the USA/UK to call it "A War on Terrorism". Yes they were blowing their own civilians before we
invaded, Were you protesting then? Were you moaning on forums then?
As for going down without a fight, picking on a couple of developing nations and bombing them back into the stone age is your idea of
fighting.....Never seen the USA pick on a country remotely its size..
Funny that eh...!
Do some research in two the World Wars you ignoramous, I'm not supporting bombing "nations" or "countries", I'm against radical groups , fascist
regimes, like the Taliban or (The Nazis) who wish to destroy their own civilians and ruin their society, and ours.
The war isn't on civilians, and they've even improved education, sanitation and trained people in some parts.
edit on 11/9/2011 by NeverForget
because: (no reason given)
edit on 11/9/2011 by NeverForget because: (no reason given)