It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Los Angeles is very active at the moment just looking at the live quake cam.

page: 6
31
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 12 2011 @ 01:35 AM
link   
i was driving through HB to Dana point right when the lightning started. It was very weird. I am from Jersey and we exp. those kind of storms during this time of year, but to see it here in socal was very strange. I know it has to do with a high level of humidity, which we did experience a little in this area... but I did not think it would be enough to cause the kinds of lighting, hail, and large rain drops we had that day... then the rolling blackouts here in socal are weird too, something is probably brewing




posted on Sep, 12 2011 @ 01:37 AM
link   
Well so far the same..... Still lots and lots of small quakes.

abclocal.go.com...

I still dont know what the hell is going on in HLL BHZ CI -- : North Hollywood

pasadena.wr.usgs.gov...

its been like that for a good while now !!!!

should look like this when normal just an example

IRM BHZ CI -- : Iron Mountain Pumping Station

pasadena.wr.usgs.gov...

pasadena.wr.usgs.gov...

The more i watch the quake cam the more it looks like volcanic activity.


edit on 4/5/2011 by dreamfox1 because: info



posted on Sep, 12 2011 @ 02:03 AM
link   
It has been for months, it will be for months and it will like that next year too.

THEY ARE ON AN ACTIVE FAULTLINE

Thought I'd make it obvious for those that can't get the connection



posted on Sep, 12 2011 @ 02:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by kwell


The next target....California September 15, 2011...that is 188 days from the Japan quake following the clockwise direction.



3 days away

lets see how your 188 theory holds up..



posted on Sep, 12 2011 @ 02:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by ignant

Originally posted by kwell


The next target....California September 15, 2011...that is 188 days from the Japan quake following the clockwise direction.



3 days away

lets see how your 188 theory holds up..


yea we will see if this still holds up and if it does i just dont know what to think anymore.



posted on Sep, 12 2011 @ 03:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by ignant

Originally posted by kwell


The next target....California September 15, 2011...that is 188 days from the Japan quake following the clockwise direction.



3 days away

lets see how your 188 theory holds up..



I really hope it doesn't. Just an observation.



posted on Sep, 12 2011 @ 03:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by ignant

Originally posted by kwell


The next target....California September 15, 2011...that is 188 days from the Japan quake following the clockwise direction.



3 days away

lets see how your 188 theory holds up..



I really hope it doesn't. Just an observation.



posted on Sep, 12 2011 @ 03:15 AM
link   
reply to post by VforVendettea
 


It's been very interesting to say the least. In the last two or three months, the frequency of earthquakes has doubled and nearly triple over the last year. In addition to that, we are also having just as many 4's and 5's as we used to have 1's, 2's, and 3's. (These numbers are experiential guesswork and are not backed by statistics). We had a 7.something about a week and a half ago down on the Aleutian Chain. Most of the people I know with androids and iPhones have earthquake watches of some kind. I've convinced my family to prepare so we could leave the house within 10 min for higher ground if a large earthquake happens around here... If you pan south west on the Earthquake Map you can see where all are bigger ones have been happening this week.

Regardless of whether LA or ANC get's the earthquake first, the west coast better "Buckle your seat belts! It's gonna be a bumpy ride!"
edit on 2011/9/12 by michaelwpayton because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 12 2011 @ 03:27 AM
link   
Here is a thread on ATS talking about an earthquake that happened in Texas today.... www.abovetopsecret.com... They are all wondering because Texas usually doesn't get earthquakes, mostly not a 4.4. They usually don't get earthquakes in Washington D.C. or New Jersey either but it is happening.



posted on Sep, 12 2011 @ 03:56 AM
link   
reply to post by kwell
 


You're doing a good job at getting this bunch all feared up. You can stop spreading your mind poison now though. I don't tolerate it.



posted on Sep, 12 2011 @ 05:18 AM
link   
And now shaking in Texas???? Why Texas?

earthquake.usgs.gov...

earthquake.usgs.gov...

Magnitude 2.6
Date-Time

Monday, September 12, 2011 at 09:19:46 UTC
Monday, September 12, 2011 at 04:19:46 AM at epicenter

Location 32.787°N, 100.858°W
Depth 4.8 km (3.0 miles)
Region WESTERN TEXAS
Distances

10 km (6 miles) NE (34°) from Snyder, TX
19 km (12 miles) NNW (331°) from Hermleigh, TX
37 km (23 miles) WSW (258°) from Rotan, TX
111 km (69 miles) WNW (290°) from Abilene, TX
380 km (236 miles) W (271°) from Dallas, TX

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 11.4 km (7.1 miles); depth +/- 3.1 km (1.9 miles)
Parameters NST= 16, Nph= 25, Dmin=115.8 km, Rmss=2.25 sec, Gp= 58°,
M-type="Nuttli" surface wave magnitude (mbLg), Version=6
Source

Magnitude: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
Location: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)

Event ID usc0005ss8

Magnitude 2.7
Date-Time

Monday, September 12, 2011 at 09:26:21 UTC
Monday, September 12, 2011 at 04:26:21 AM at epicenter

Location 32.057°N, 101.128°W
Depth 5 km (3.1 miles)
Region WESTERN TEXAS
Distances

23 km (14 miles) ESE (105°) from Forsan, TX
28 km (17 miles) NNW (331°) from Sterling City, TX
31 km (20 miles) SSE (148°) from Coahoma, TX
137 km (85 miles) WSW (252°) from Abilene, TX
416 km (258 miles) W (260°) from Dallas, TX

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 14.1 km (8.8 miles); depth +/- 3.1 km (1.9 miles)
Parameters NST= 17, Nph= 20, Dmin=153.6 km, Rmss=2.36 sec, Gp= 76°,
M-type="Nuttli" surface wave magnitude (mbLg), Version=4
Source

Magnitude: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
Location: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)

Event ID usc0005ssm

And the earlier activity

earthquake.usgs.gov...

Magnitude 4.4
Date-Time

Sunday, September 11, 2011 at 12:27:45 UTC
Sunday, September 11, 2011 at 07:27:45 AM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 32.874°N, 100.804°W
Depth 10.3 km (6.4 miles)
Region WESTERN TEXAS
Distances 19 km (11 miles) NNE of Snyder, Texas
57 km (35 miles) NW of Sweetwater, Texas
126 km (78 miles) SE of Lubbock, Texas
409 km (254 miles) NW of AUSTIN, Texas
Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 14.8 km (9.2 miles); depth +/- 7 km (4.3 miles)
Parameters NST=237, Nph=239, Dmin=112.4 km, Rmss=1.52 sec, Gp= 40°,
M-type=body wave magnitude (Mb), Version=6
Source

Magnitude: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
Location: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)

Event ID usc0005shp

earthquake.usgs.gov...

Magnitude 2.7
Date-Time

Sunday, September 11, 2011 at 20:31:58 UTC
Sunday, September 11, 2011 at 03:31:58 PM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 32.892°N, 100.848°W
Depth 5 km (3.1 miles) set by location program
Region WESTERN TEXAS
Distances 19 km (11 miles) NNE of Snyder, Texas
62 km (38 miles) NW of Sweetwater, Texas
121 km (75 miles) SE of Lubbock, Texas
414 km (257 miles) NW of AUSTIN, Texas
Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 10.1 km (6.3 miles); depth fixed by location program
Parameters NST= 12, Nph= 12, Dmin=116.9 km, Rmss=1.19 sec, Gp= 61°,
M-type="Nuttli" surface wave magnitude (mbLg), Version=5
Source

USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)

Event ID us2011qsba

Magnitude 2.8
Date-Time

Monday, September 12, 2011 at 00:31:49 UTC
Sunday, September 11, 2011 at 07:31:49 PM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 32.810°N, 100.892°W
Depth 4.3 km (2.7 miles) (poorly constrained)
Region WESTERN TEXAS
Distances 10 km (6 miles) N of Snyder, Texas
58 km (36 miles) NW of Sweetwater, Texas
124 km (77 miles) SE of Lubbock, Texas
411 km (255 miles) NW of AUSTIN, Texas
Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 11.8 km (7.3 miles); depth +/- 13.9 km (8.6 miles)
Parameters NST= 11, Nph= 11, Dmin=119.1 km, Rmss=0.76 sec, Gp= 58°,
M-type="Nuttli" surface wave magnitude (mbLg), Version=4
Source

Magnitude: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
Location: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)

Event ID usc0005spv

earthquake.usgs.gov...


edit on 4/5/2011 by dreamfox1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 12 2011 @ 06:04 AM
link   
reply to post by kwell
 


Yes for 58 years dude,your theory holds about as much water as when I was a little kid,every year we were gonna have the "Big One",and come Thursday will be another sunny day,way lay out and tan,you assume too much



posted on Sep, 12 2011 @ 08:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by ButterCookie
Hmmmm....maybe so

Check this out

www.quakeprediction.com...

and this

twitter.com...#!/quakeprediction

I say Cali needs to rumble... I know that sounds very harsh and cruel


Just be careful with the quake prediction site.

I got this, and assuming it is not a hate site then I have to wonder why it has a bad rating. Not going there.




posted on Sep, 12 2011 @ 08:57 AM
link   
reply to post by Cyanhide
 


I can confirm that, we have witnessed the exact same thing here in noord-holland.
Lightnings were continually going on but no sound at all... continually i mean literally non-stop!
I was standing on the balcony, thinking it's like a start of a freaky horror movie



posted on Sep, 12 2011 @ 09:06 AM
link   
The 188 days of coincidence is pretty telling. I guess we need to come back on the 16th and confirm or deny the accuracy once again. I have a feeling nothing will happen though. It seems as if every time I try to find a relation....there is none.
NOT that I want to see a "big one" happen on the 15th...no way. Don't get me wrong.... it would be nice if after all these years of people studying and researching EQ's if there was some relation found and we could truly predict them....it would save lives!



posted on Sep, 12 2011 @ 09:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by Indecent
reply to post by kwell
 


You're doing a good job at getting this bunch all feared up. You can stop spreading your mind poison now though. I don't tolerate it.


Yeah . . . just take your Somma and quiet down.

Watch the mind-numbing, mind-control TV screen and march in step compliantly.

Remember that Denial is to be favored over Truth.

All praise to the globalist Marxist tyranny.

/super sarcasm



posted on Sep, 12 2011 @ 10:13 AM
link   
I found this link yesterday, can't remember where i took it from (from this thread or another one)

earthquakescanada.nrcan.gc.ca...

I think it's about Canada... Yesterday was pretty quite, now it seems to have parkinsons. They might have changed the scale... I don't know

Edit: and this one seems to be back in "quiet mood" abclocal.go.com...
edit on 12-9-2011 by Bers81 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 12 2011 @ 12:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by dreamfox1
And now shaking in Texas???? Why Texas?


Here is a thought...FEMA held mass casualty exercises in Texas on 9/11/11(yesterday)..... theintelhub.com... If you take another look at the U.S. Navy map of the future Texas is untouched by the water....www.youtube.com... So you would think if there is a huge tsunami coming that there would have to be some kind of earthquake activity in Texas. FEMA also ordered an undisclosed number of underwater body bags.... I really don't mean to be morbid, I am just looking at the facts.



posted on Sep, 12 2011 @ 07:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by kwell

Originally posted by dreamfox1
And now shaking in Texas???? Why Texas?


Here is a thought...FEMA held mass casualty exercises in Texas on 9/11/11(yesterday)..... theintelhub.com... If you take another look at the U.S. Navy map of the future Texas is untouched by the water....www.youtube.com... So you would think if there is a huge tsunami coming that there would have to be some kind of earthquake activity in Texas. FEMA also ordered an undisclosed number of underwater body bags.... I really don't mean to be morbid, I am just looking at the facts.



Underwater body bags
Would you mind posting a link to where/how you found this info out?That's very strange.

Thanks is advance


ETA
I just realized my question is off-topic...my apologies

edit on 9/12/11 by ThePublicEnemyNo1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 12 2011 @ 07:54 PM
link   
reply to post by ThePublicEnemyNo1
 


I googled "underwater body bags"

lots there.

www.google.com...




top topics



 
31
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join