It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Chemtrails Exposed

page: 4
5
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 27 2011 @ 12:33 AM
link   
reply to post by EyeDontKnow
 


Thats because the ONLY chemicals that are being dumped on the average citizen,are coming out of automobiles and smokestacks. We have a better record in the US of trying to keep pollution at bay. But, visit China and India,and there is the problem. Just imagine where that pollution is going...... No reason to do it clandestinely. Its in your face,everyday. I dont see people giving up their cars,or plastic bags,or their computers. I see people claiming chemtrails,where they are the perpetrators of killing this planet,myself included. We should all do our best to go green.MHO




posted on Sep, 27 2011 @ 01:05 AM
link   
reply to post by sonnny1
 


agreed.



posted on Sep, 27 2011 @ 02:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by TMJ1972


the B747 is too complex to be controlled by remote in a way that some official would sign that to have it flying.
Too much could go wrong to have roughly $110mio bucks being flown this way.


^ ^ that is the claim large aircraft cannot be flown remotely.



posted on Sep, 27 2011 @ 03:23 PM
link   
reply to post by thereisnotry
 


No it isn't - it is a claim that it WOULD not be done (for reasons of complexity and potential problems) - not that it COULD not be done.

2nd



posted on Sep, 27 2011 @ 03:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by thereisnotry

Originally posted by TMJ1972


the B747 is too complex to be controlled by remote in a way that some official would sign that to have it flying.
Too much could go wrong to have roughly $110mio bucks being flown this way.


^ ^ that is the claim large aircraft cannot be flown remotely.


No, it's a claim that some official would not sign for it. Hardly relevant when you are talking about a massive covert operation.


Kind of a moot point anyway, as there's no reason to fly them remotely. It's easier not to, and probably takes less people.

[ETA: grrr Aloysius the Gaul!
]
edit on 27-9-2011 by Uncinus because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 27 2011 @ 03:27 PM
link   
reply to post by sonnny1
 


Brown Clouds

www.msnbc.msn.com...

Dirty Brown Clouds Impact Glaciers, Agriculture And The Monsoon

etc


edit on 27-9-2011 by Essan because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 11 2011 @ 02:51 AM
link   
This article here has been selected to appear on the home page of TheIntelHub.com. TheIntelHub.com is one of my favorite alt. media websites and I am proud to be a part of it. Here is a direct link to the article:

theintelhub.com...

I hope this is not considered bad forum etiquette.
edit on 10/11/2011 by TheRealMrX because: deletion of sentence



posted on Oct, 11 2011 @ 03:54 AM
link   
reply to post by TheRealMrX
 


I actually read that link from start to finish.

The pattern was very much to the standard formula;

Make claim based on personal assumption, making no attempt to actually learn anything about the subject (the description about how contrails are supposed to behave betrays that an opinion has been formed with almost zero knowledge behind it)

Then insult the intelligence/bravery of anyone who might disagree to try to make any opposing viewpoint look stupid and head off any argument from anyone who genuinely knows what they are talking about. This is always a sign of weakness or insecurity in the writer.

Repeat claim for good measure

Obfuscate article with spurious facts, with total disregard for any relevance they actually have to the claim, but it makes it look like the writer knows what they are talking about to anyone else who also also knows nothing about contrails either.

Appeal to the fear and ignorance they hope the reader has.

The entire thing is a dismal failure. I can't imagine why anyone would be proud to be associated with such amateurish tosh which is obvious disinformation and fear mongering, designed to appeal to the lowest common denominator.

If it wasn't for the excessive quote policy on here that article could be *factually* deconstructed almost line by line. Indeed, if you read maybe the top five threads on here current,y, it already has been, by far more qualified people than me.

edit on 11-10-2011 by waynos because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 11 2011 @ 10:53 AM
link   
reply to post by waynos
 


You really only need one quote - the one on which they base their entire argument:


Contrails are unaduIterated and typically disappear within 2 minutes while chemtrails can linger for hours.


Since science and history (and the personal recollections of many people here on ATS) prove this wrong, then their entire argument is baseless.



posted on Oct, 11 2011 @ 02:50 PM
link   
reply to post by Uncinus
 


Well, yes. It does sort of scream "everything that follows is pure fiction, please switch off your brain before continuing"



posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 01:58 AM
link   
reply to post by Uncinus
 

My personal favorite is the opening line:

"According to all United States federal government organizations, chemtrails do not exist and/or are a conspiracy theory."

That right there should steer people in the right direction.



posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 04:24 AM
link   
reply to post by TheRealMrX
 


I get the impression you think that when the Govt says something it is automatically untrue - is that a correct impression on my part??



posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 06:25 AM
link   
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
 


and if that is indeed the view of " TheRealMrX"

it needs to be noted that " the govt " advises against drinking a litre of petrol [ gasoline ] for breakfast

assuming that " TheRealMrX" heeds this advise - one assumses he does otherise he would be dead

one must ask - why he heeds this govt advise ?

PS - before replying that " its obvious " you should not drink petrol - why is " it obvious " , is it obvious because you have a rudimentary grasp of chemistry and toxicology ??????????

if so - then bear in mind that a rudimentary grasp of meteorology and aeronautic science would englighten you to the fallacies of " chemtrail " argumernts .



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 09:28 AM
link   
The chemtrails are to shroud the Photon Belt our Planet is about to go through.

Just Sayin.



new topics

top topics



 
5
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join