List of Obama’s Epic Failures

reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus


Hmm, sort of like how he kept saying during that congressional speech the other night, pass this bill, pass this bill right away ect ect.

It is very much akin to when certain members jump on ATS and try to EMPHASIZE words with CAPITAL letters. As if CAPITALIZING a word makes them RIGHT and you WRONG when you DISAGREE and type in LOWER case letters. I'm not impressed; over emphasis in any form, be that written or spoken can make no real difference at all. It's actually irritating.

Anyway, I'm not perfect and normally try to refrain from taking a whole inventory on anyone else. The guy has a very unique job and access to information the normal person doesn't. That said, he has a little more time in office until the next election. Maybe he can do something people deem right at some point. I would like to point out that the President is just one part of the decision making process, congress has a role too.

You need to get your definition of "failures" into priority.
All those things you listed were not even close to being "failures".

Here i know you may not know what the world failure means, so this might help you out.

Anyways, if Obama was actually a legit person, i could like him.
He has a lisp, is left handed,rh negative and has a stutter, all the things i have.

When people seem to call me out or make fun of my stutter, i simply say, "well Obama has one, and he's the president"....shuts em up and works all the time, since they believe politics is real.
If Obama is a "failure" then i'd say every other president was a joke, just time doing stand up huh.
Hey he killed Osama!

Originally posted by mudbeed
reply to post by Freedom_is_Slavery

 

Just so you know:

War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength

Those three statements combined are the perfect definition of the Republican party at this very moment.

Are they, now? Who got the Nobel Peace Prize while killing Iraqis? Who is refusing to cease the murders of the citizens of sovereign nations? As CIC he has the authority to cease hostilities at any time. I guess "at any time" is any time that isn't now.

/TOA

reply to post by The Old American


yeah he got that nobel bell peace prize for killing

iraqis
afghanis
pakistanis
somalians
and saudis.
and yemeni
and libyans

that prize sure means alot.

reply to post by mudbeed


And then there's the illegal invasion of Libya. The website BlackAgendaReports in November reported that over 30,000 Black Libyans were murdered by the "democracy-seeking" rebels..who are now in charge of that country.

From Glen Ford, editor, Black Agenda Reports:

Nearly eight months of incessant bombing by the air forces of nations that account for 70 percent of the world’s weapons spending, all culminating in the gang-bang slaughter of Moammar Gaddafi, his son Mutassim and his military chief of staff, outside Sirte. The NATO-armed bands then displayed the battered corpses for days in Misurata – the city that had earlier made good on its vow to “purge Black skin” through the massacre and dispersal of 30,000 darker residents of nearby Tawurgha – before disposing of the bodies in an unknown location.

####

The first Black president of the USA is complicit in the deaths of more Africans than any US president in recent history.

Originally posted by neo96


the epic failure of the current potus is astounding and the sheep are begging for more of the same.

People voting for him again?

Hes been campaigning since he became the President !!!!!

Originally posted by Nephalim
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus

 

Hmm, sort of like how he kept saying during that congressional speech the other night, pass this bill, pass this bill right away ect ect.

It is very much akin to when certain members jump on ATS and try to EMPHASIZE words with CAPITAL letters. As if CAPITALIZING a word makes them RIGHT and you WRONG when you DISAGREE and type in LOWER case letters. I'm not impressed; over emphasis in any form, be that written or spoken can make no real difference at all. It's actually irritating.

Anyway, I'm not perfect and normally try to refrain from taking a whole inventory on anyone else. The guy has a very unique job and access to information the normal person doesn't.

That said, he has a little more time in office until the next election. Maybe he can do something people deem right at some point. I would like to point out that the President is just one part of the decision making process, congress has a role too.

edit on 9-9-2011 by Nephalim because: (no reason given)

Of course Congress has a role. That is the point of checks and balances of the different branches of govt. Look, I will be very frank. Obama is a Marxist and I'm sorry if that hurts people's sensitivities, but it's true and it's not all that hidden. The people around him are all Marxist/communist/radical. He is not a centrist, contrary to what some people have suggested, but I think that idea is just owing to the fact that as a left Hegelian, he is still part of the CFR NWO apparatus which envelopes both left and right.
As far as Congress, oh yes, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Maxine Watters, Bernie Sanders and others are all members of DSA(Democratic Socialists of America), and due to the high presence of these people, Congress is basically corrupted with a socialist agenda. You may like it, but many don't. Incidentally, I am of the opinion that this is the reason why there is so much of an emphasis lately on "direct democracy" being spouted by people everywhere. I think either people don't really know just what it is they are really asking for with this, or they are part of the collusion, or just brainwashed or whatever. It sounds really good huh? Direct Democracy, people being part of the process and all. But it's just another face of socialism. And as many times as I've said it, I have to say again, socialism is a bridge to communism. They all have said it, Marx, Lenin, the CPUSA, etc.
So what's wrong with communism? It is a complete failure and a terrible loss of individual liberty.

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus

As far as Congress, oh yes, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Maxine Watters, Bernie Sanders and others are all members of DSA(Democratic Socialists of America), and due to the high presence of these people, Congress is basically corrupted with a socialist agenda.

So does that make those who voted for these people IGNORANT,or do they know they are SOCIALISTS,COMMUNISTS ?

Old Joe McCarthy is looking like a genius now.................

Originally posted by sonnny1

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus

As far as Congress, oh yes, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Maxine Watters, Bernie Sanders and others are all members of DSA(Democratic Socialists of America), and due to the high presence of these people, Congress is basically corrupted with a socialist agenda.

So does that make those who voted for these people IGNORANT,or do they know they are SOCIALISTS,COMMUNISTS ?

Old Joe McCarthy is looking like a genius now.................

edit on 10-12-2011 by sonnny1 because: (no reason given)

I doubt that people knew all these Congress Kritters are socialist, and if they did, they didn't care or think it's cool. That's the sad truth of it, is that people just know that free stuff is great and they will vote for people who give them free stuff.
some people voted for Obama because he said he was going to give them stuff. some people voted for him thinking that he would unifiy people and be the all-in-all and heal wounds and be an advocate for them. I think some voted for him because they got a leg tingle(sorry had to throw that one in) and some probably have the guilt thing going and think that is going to assuage it. Then there is the college crowd who thought he was really cool. He was novel, a first time black president and a way to beat the Republicans. He was the trump card for Democrats. He was the perfect liberal for liberals. He sounded good and had charisma.
And look I liked him till I listened to what he actually had to say. His insistence that sex-ed for kindergartners was the right thing to do turned me away from him permanently. There was nothing he could have said or done to change my mind then. And then I read Corsi's "Obamanation" exposing his radical Marxist roots. It was a done deal for me on that.
HIllary is just as Marxist so it wouldn't have mattered which one got it really.

awesome post F and S and reposted elsewhere for optimum viewing pleasure