It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by doubleplusungood
reply to post by Genophage
Originally posted by Genophage
Im not totally denying evolution...but ive always wondered...if we evolved from chimps/apes..why do we still have some running around? slow learners? -shrugs-
S&F thanks for sharing OP
Originally posted by Freedom_is_Slavery
This is interesting stuff, I wonder what all the creationists have to say about this one,
www.telegraph.co.uk...
EVIDENCE is mounting that fossils nearly 2 million years old revealed last year are those of the oldest member of the human family.
The creature, named Australopithecus sediba, may even have been the world's first toolmaker,
judging from a detailed study of its hand, the most complete ever found of an ancient hominin, or human-like creature.
Because the remains show a "mosiac" of primitive Australopithecine and more modern hominin traits, he argues, it should be reclassified as Homo sediba,
dumping the current contender for first Homo, Homo habillis. In April last year,
Professor Berger and James Cook University geologist Paul Dirks stunned the scientific world when their group reported the discovery of skeletal remains
of a juvenile male and an adult female at Malapa cave, 50km northwest of Johannesburg.
www.theaustralian.com.au...
www.theaustralian.com.au
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by BlastedCaddy
Just like everything else in this area, its all theory. I am sure there is a definitive answer but you and I will only know when they let us know till then, theorize away...
Originally posted by Bkrmn
reply to post by jimnuggits
How dare you accuse me of being racist, when you don't even know me! What I posted was a mix of stuff I've read over the years, and my own personal opinion drawn from that! That doesn't make me racist! People like you make me sick! You are brave from a distance, especially when you can hide behind a keyboard!
To anyone else who thinks that what I wrote are comments from someone who is racist, I am sorry if I offended you, as this wasn't my intent. It's a shame that in a country where "freedom of speech" is a right that many died to uphold, a person can't say anything without fear of being labelled!
If any Mod finds my previous post to be offensive, please remove it! Thank you!
Originally posted by Robert Reynolds
After considering both biblical and evolutionary descriptions of our occurence, I've noticed a similarity between the two: they both require you to believe what's put in front of you. Priest or Professor? Take your pick.
Personally I think this world is run by liars and I have no reason to think they haven't compromised the honesty of our education system. In fact, I think doing so would be a priority.
Originally posted by Bkrmn
I think this "Missing lLnk" that science has been searching for all these years, has been alive and doing well all along...
I could be wrong, but I'm sure I read somewhere that studies credit Asians as being more intelligent than Whites, who are more intelligent than Blacks, with the Geat Apes coming in fourth.
It is my personal belief that if a "Missing Link" is to be found, then those searching should be taking a look at Africa's lesser mentally developed tribes, such as one whose members are cannibalistic, and still take apes as sex partners.
Originally posted by Robert Reynolds
reply to post by izero
Could you prove this to me or will I have to take your word for it? Even if you claim to have had evolution definitively proven to you, I'll still have to put faith - ultimately - in your words.
Every single lie that's ever been believed, has made sense to the believer.
Edit: I assume you believe in quantum theory? Would you like to make a common sense argument against that area of science.
PS: awful lot of symmetry in biology isn't there? Considering it all happened randomly.
edit on 10-9-2011 by Robert Reynolds because: (no reason given)