Why David Icke Is Lord, God Wingnut of The Universe. And Why You Should Stop Listening To Him., page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 15 times


reply posted on 18-11-2011 @ 12:13 AM by Threadfall
Originally posted by Swills
reply to
post by Heartisblack



He's not bat # crazy, a lot of what he says a lot of people agree with. He is accused of being bat # crazy when he starts talking about reptiles and what have you. As far as the global agenda of the elite and their practices, he's spot on. Check out the Bilderberg group and Bohemian Grove if you're not familiar with this, but being a member of this website I am sure you are.

David Icke as Lord? Who is saying that?


What's your point? Even a broken clock is right twice a day...still doesn't mean everything is in working order.

Maybe a lot of people believe him because there are a lot of mentally infirm and gullible people out there.

edit on 18-11-2011 by Threadfall because: grammar



reply posted on 19-11-2011 @ 02:38 PM by TruthxIsxInxThexMist
reply to post by Frater210



I'm not too sure you've listened to everything Icke has to say.... a lot of what he says is true thats for sure.... what i laugh at though is when he goes all reptilian on us (that to me is just silly) but definately the rest of what he says is mainly true!!
edit on 19-11-2011 by TruthxIsxInxThexMist because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 12-1-2012 @ 07:33 PM by Frater210
reply to post by quackers





Those without the ability to think outside the box, or is completely ignorant of what a metaphor is, should not read, listen, watch or comment on David Icke. Why? Because they completely miss the point and instead hate on a man due to their own inability to grasp simple concepts let alone covert meaning. Icke may have said he was the son of God, but he also stated we are all the son of God. He never claimed to be Jesus or the like contrary to the opinion many a shill. As for the whole reptile thing, well if you honestly believe he's talking about lizard people then not only are you missing the point, but your comprehension skills are shockingly terrible.


Quacker's I mean no offense and I am sorry for being so late with this but you never bothered to offer what the point is that Icke is trying to make. 'metaphor' is not a point, more like a diffuse line, as it should be.

So would you mind telling me for what the subway full of Illuminati eye symbols is a metaphor. You seem to share a mind with David, please enlighten us all.

Also, are you actually calling me a shill? That's funny, ATS seems to be so casually aware of these 'shills'. Would you be willing to expand on that idea?




reply posted on 13-1-2012 @ 09:39 AM by quackers
reply to post by Frater210



No offence taken. Look at it this way, if I pointed someone out to you and described them as a cat would you honestly expect them to meow or would you be intelligent enough to understand that I'm speaking figuratively and they possess cat like traits and manerisms? If you were unintelligent or simply trying to be difficult, you might say something along the lines of "don't be so stupid they look nothing like a cat, you must be crazy".

The shill would insist I was actually saying the person was a cat which is rediculous, everyone agrees, everyone misses the point. Icke himself has explained the lizard thing yet people still want to take him littleraly and then use their own misunderstanding to bash the man.

That's how I see it anyway. He might not be right but it at least helps to understand what he is really talking about. Its all there for those who can be bothered be a bit more objective.


reply posted on 13-1-2012 @ 12:02 PM by Frater210
reply to post by quackers



Thanks Quackers.

Would you be willing to find his apologia in a nutshell and bring it over here and post it? I would love to read his rationale for what he says. I actually believe that David is a very sweet and kind man at heart. I like to think that I can see that in him through the metaphor of his eyes.




reply posted on 13-1-2012 @ 12:55 PM by quackers
reply to post by Frater210



Not 100% on which particular bit of film has him talking about it. It might be on a documantary done on him while he was in Canada a few years back on a booksigning/conference tour. On this tour he was persistantly harassed by members of the ADL (who also got to voice their opinion on Icke in the film) because they believed that the lizards Icke was refering to were a euphemism for Jews (as if anyone would ever believe that the Jews are a ruthless race hell bent on control of the masses through manipulation and have been at it for centuries, thats just daft. Isn't it?). If i recall its not so much about Ickes views but about him and what he has and is continuing to have to go through simply for stating his views in the public forum. I will try ro find a link if i get time, orherwise it shouldnt be too dificilt to find on the net.

This might be it;


Google Video Link


Also of relevence;



The other foundation of the ridicule was that I had supposed to have called myself the Son of God, implying that I wasJesus or something. Ironically 'Jesus' is a 'man' I have no doubt did not exist as depicted by Christianity as I
have explained in detail in some of my books. I used the term 'Son of God' in the sense of being an aspect, as I understood it at the time, of the Infinite consciousness that is everything. As I have written before, we are like droplets of water in an ocean of infinite consciousness. We are 'individual' on one level, but also part of the infinite whole. More than that, we are the infinite whole as I shall later explain. I was not trying to say I had come to save the world or anything, only that, like everyone and everything else in all existence, I was an aspect of the Infinite and not just a physical 'personality'.

If you call the Infinite consciousness 'God', I was trying to say, we are all the symbolic 'sons' and 'daughters of 'God'. Obviously my awareness of these matters has increased dramatically since then, but that was the
basis of my comments about being a 'Son of God'. However, I was both misrepresented in the media and, with my mind downloading so much information following the mound in Peru, I wasn't grounded or 'here'
enough to articulate clearly what I was trying to say and this led to even greater misrepresentation and misunderstanding among those who ridiculed and laughed.



Icke's Tales From The Time Loop link

edit on 13-1-2012 by quackers because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 16-2-2012 @ 09:37 PM by Unity_99
reply to post by johnnymax



If you understand the universe you wouldn't ask that. Its a hologram and it would be a very low tech group that would tow a planet or moon, though I'm sure some do, and not with our technology, they would steer it with some kind of collider type job within or scalar waves, and they wouldn't use normal speed, but hyperspace.

We don't understand the universe and we have ant hill technology. Now on an even higher level of the metaphorical digital, imagine being the coders.

However, that is not what this is. Earth was moved too, and it was a much higher frequency then.
edit on 16-2-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



A Theory of the Federal Reserve and Petrol Dollar Reserve
  Posted 16 days ago with 4 member flags
Henrik Palmgren makes false claims re: global living
  Posted 8 days ago with 1 member flags
A few that blew the coup
  Posted 5 days ago with 1 member flags
Santos Bonacci (astrotheology)
  Posted 6 days ago with 0 member flags
Cubes, Everywhere in movies (symbolism)
  Posted 5 days ago with 0 member flags
i hear the low hum... but only inside?
  Posted 4 days ago with 0 member flags
When conspiracy theories lead to tied-up thinking.
  Posted 2 days ago with 0 member flags