It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Partisanity
reply to post by Wyn Hawks
So again I'll ask you, you would've rather her had the choice? Or be forced to die? Which do you think that the political interpretations of "death penalty" entails?
Originally posted by Partisanity
And I don't appreciate you saying I would have ridiculed her kids;
Originally posted by Partisanity
I don't make up random garbage out of spite to support a moot point
previously posted by Partisanity
So give the perp a choice, death or prison... that's your argument, right? Oh wait, nope, partisan rhetoric took over for your linear logic. ALWAYS KILL, MUST KILL.
Originally posted by Turq1
Was watching a short documentary on the death penalty and I guess in the case of lethal injection, they hook up 3 IV lines to the person, one of which is a dummy line that isn't hooked up. So the "health professionals" pushing the deadly drugs from behind a curtain don't know if they gave it or not, said it was a liability issue. Seems a bit cowardly really. Trying to make killing someone "clean", a bit ridiculous.
Originally posted by TDawgRex
Most prosecutors are politicians in waiting as are many of the defense attorneys...they have forgotten their code.
Innocent until proven guilty.
Originally posted by Griffo
On a slightly similar note, I only found out what the 3 strikes and you're out rule was a couple of weeks ago courtesy of QI and I am shocked.
Originally posted by nfflhome
reply to post by Zanti Misfit
hang em high, I want cruel and unusual punishment.I want them to be afraid of the punishment.I want them very afraid of the punishment. Texas for ever!!!
Originally posted by Plotus
You make the argument that killing is wrong........ by who's standards?