It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
Also, I am pro-death penalty. These are not innocent babies, these are convicted criminals. The only problem I have with the death penalty is that we authorize a third party to carry out the execution, and thereby sanction an additional murder. I think it should be up to the families of the victims to carry out the execution. If they want to do it, they flip the switch, not some uninvolved 3rd party. If the family declines that right, then the perpetrator gets life in prison. So, I'm all for the death penalty, I'm just not for an uninvolved party carrying it out.
Originally posted by camaro68ss
I love RP but im concerned these pictures make him look extreamly weak. For crying out loud perry is grabing him and pointing at him like hes a little school girl that just got cought stealing someones lunch. If this goes main stream i dont think it will look good for Dr Paul
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
It will be fascinating to see just how they try and spin this to say it's anything but what the pictures seem to clearly show. Perry is very aggressive and it's being kind to say he's invading Paul's personal space. Dr. Paul looks like he's just in a touch of shock while thinking "Is this REALLY happening in front of national media cameras?? Really??". This is really one of those off the cuff type moments we so rarely see of the candidates but that speak volumes for the brief glimpse they give. Incredible..... I am glad these pics are out and spreading so quickly.
Ron Paul is Pro-Life, as am I in 90% of cases
Also, I am pro-death penalty.
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow
Sure, they're all sociopaths. Leave it up to a Republican audience to clap whenever the death penalty is mentioned.
It's just another dog-and-pony show and you've been fooled once again if you think anything is going to come out of this.
Ron Paul's views on abortion concern me only because government has no right to tell a woman what she can or cannot do with her body.
Those who strongly advocate something called FREEDOM should keep in mind that freedom is broad, freedom is free (don't listen to the soldiers who say otherwise) and freedom does not discriminate.
Originally posted by BillyBoBBizWorth
Ron Paul is Pro-Life, as am I in 90% of cases
Also, I am pro-death penalty.
What?
Doesn't that sound contradictory to you?edit on 8-9-2011 by BillyBoBBizWorth because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by BillyBoBBizWorth
I thought I explained it in the rest of that post, but the answer is NO.
How is it contradictory to want to protect the innocent life of a child, and also protect the innocent life of a child by killing predators that might harm them?
If a rabid wolf comes to the backyard of my neighbor, and eats their child, and then shows up in my yard, I won't be shooing it way with a broom and hoping it moves on to the next neighbor, instead I will kill it permanently and end the threat.
Originally posted by Clisen33
reply to post by Tgautier13
Jon huntsman belongs to the huntsman family (obviously) in which owns huntsman polyurethanes. Huntsman polyurethanes has numerous chemical manufacturing plants world wide and is right along there with Dow Chemical and Hexion. I used to work at a plant owned by huntsman and I have pretty extensive knowledge about the company. One thing for sure, I won't be voting for Jon. Reason being is his close connection with corporate business. Jon being ambassador to China is a big issue with me. Reason being is that huntsman has and is expanding it's chemical manufacturing in China - see where I'm getting at? Possible big time tax and or other financial breaks for the family business... With him being president, I think you would see huntsman polyurethanes grow immensely.
Huntsman holds global leadership positions in MDI (diphenylmethane diisocyanate), polyurethane catalysts, epoxy adhesives, epoxy powder coating systems, aerospace composites, electrical insulating materials, textile effect chemicals, polyetheramines, ethylene and propylene carbonates, and maleic anhydride.
2010 revenues were over $9 billion.
I thought I explained it in the rest of that post, but the answer is NO.
How is it contradictory to want to protect the innocent life of a child, and also protect the innocent life of a child by killing predators that might harm them?
Originally posted by mudbeed
reply to post by Akasirus
How do you figure that grabbing someone's wrist and pointing your finger... getting really close in someone's face as not being threatening?
After listening to Perry, the fact you think that Perry was lightly touching a wrist is not correct at all. He grabbed his wrist. Look at the form of Perry's body. Also look at Paul's reaction.
Especially to the point Huntsman stood between them (at Paul's podium mind you)
Have you looked at all the pics.
I personally do not think the MSM has talked about this enough.
Doubting other ATSers is fine, but next time research it.edit on 9/8/2011 by mudbeed because: (no reason given)