FLT 93 The Second Debris Field, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 12-9-2011 @ 01:42 PM by waypastvne
Originally posted by earthdude


Look, here is the wind direction for that day. You are grasping at straws.
www.wunderground.com...
edit on 12-9-2011 by earthdude because: (no reason given)



The exact wind direction that day can be taken directly off of the stain on the ground that the oil vapour from the engine core left. I used that stain to line up the paths that the wing tip vortices would have traveled in this photo (red lines). This path lines up perfectly with Indian Lake and New Baltimore.

edit on 12-9-2011 by waypastvne because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 12-9-2011 @ 01:51 PM by earthdude
reply to post by waypastvne


Yes you are right, I was wrong, I read the map wrong. Still, too much distance.


reply posted on 12-9-2011 @ 01:55 PM by GenRadek
Originally posted by earthdude


Look, here is the wind direction for that day. You are grasping at straws.
www.wunderground.com...
edit on 12-9-2011 by earthdude because: (no reason given)




Yes, it says its blowing from the NW. Wind speed direction is always shown from the direction it is blowing from.

Wind Speed 8 mph (NW)
Max Wind Speed 15 mph
Max Gust Speed 23 mph
Visibility 10 miles


So thank you for once again, confirming what we have been stating all along. Winds were blowing from the NW towards the SE.

So, again, where are you pulling this "debris traveling 'upwind'" again?



reply posted on 12-9-2011 @ 02:03 PM by hooper
Originally posted by earthdude
reply to
post by waypastvne


Yes you are right, I was wrong, I read the map wrong. Still, too much distance.



Too much based on.....what? What's the baseline? Whats an acceptable distance? What makes it acceptable? Is there a range?


reply posted on 15-9-2011 @ 12:11 PM by earthdude
Originally posted by hooper
Originally posted by earthdude
reply to
post by waypastvne


Yes you are right, I was wrong, I read the map wrong. Still, too much distance.



Too much based on.....what? What's the baseline? Whats an acceptable distance? What makes it acceptable? Is there a range?

I guess I could see paper going that far. Too bad there is no heavy stuff to support my argument. I still stand by it, gut feeling and perception of physics. I would be up for an experiment where papers were released in a wooded area to see how far they would blow.


reply posted on 15-9-2011 @ 12:26 PM by hooper
reply to post by earthdude



I think the experiment would be pretty easy. Go to the top of any structure where you have a pretty good idea as to the height. For instance, generally speaking one story equals about 10' in height. Drop a piece of paper. As long as the prevailing wind is not blowing into the structure, see how far away it lands. Extrapolate. Imperfect but it would give you an idea.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 12 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 4 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 14 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 8 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 16 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 18 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 8 days ago with 8 member flags