It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ddaniel
Just found this site that shows new, high resolution (or at least the highest we have so far) pictures of foot tracks / rover tracks on the surface of the moon.
I suppose these are a hoax as well...
Originally posted by ddaniel
Just found this site that shows new, high resolution (or at least the highest we have so far) pictures of foot tracks / rover tracks on the surface of the moon.
I suppose these are a hoax as well...
I went to the barber a month ago. I have not been back since. Did I go to the barber?
Originally posted by 11I11
Originally posted by ddaniel
Just found this site that shows new, high resolution (or at least the highest we have so far) pictures of foot tracks / rover tracks on the surface of the moon.
I suppose these are a hoax as well...
To be honest that picture isnt going to convince anyone in the hoax camp my friend. Personally I do not believe man landed on the moon. My reason?...... Just on the basis that the last time man apparently landed on the moon was 1972 and i cannot understand why we wouldnt have been back since.
Originally posted by cointelprotroll
Just because you lived through something doesn't mean you are the ultimate source of information for that event.
Originally posted by alfa1
Originally posted by patternfinder
they use the familiar tactics of insinuation where they show you a pic that isn't quite discernible, then they show you a clear pic of the items from the old pics..
But in the old pics, the items are in exactly the same orientation and location as the objects in the new pics.
You dont have to trust me. Check it for yourself.
Take any of the Apollo missions, make a map of the objects on the ground according to the 1960's photos, then see for yourself that it matches the same as todays LROC pictures.
Originally posted by Frira
+ Here's a picture. (evidence)
- The picture is Photoshopped! (opinion)
Originally posted by patternfinder
Originally posted by alfa1
Originally posted by patternfinder
they use the familiar tactics of insinuation where they show you a pic that isn't quite discernible, then they show you a clear pic of the items from the old pics..
But in the old pics, the items are in exactly the same orientation and location as the objects in the new pics.
You dont have to trust me. Check it for yourself.
Take any of the Apollo missions, make a map of the objects on the ground according to the 1960's photos, then see for yourself that it matches the same as todays LROC pictures.
i can do that with MY photoshop....that's easy to do......
Originally posted by Frira
Originally posted by cointelprotroll
Just because you lived through something doesn't mean you are the ultimate source of information for that event.
Did I say it meant that-- or does it just help dismiss the clear meaning by claiming that was my intent?
That I lived through an experience does, in fact, make me an authority on the experience.
That my experience has relation to the event, then, is "perspective" and it is perspective that many hoax-believers seem to lack but, unlike experience, can gain from another. And that was my intent.
- The astronauts are lying! (emotion)
+ Here's a picture. (evidence)
- The picture is Photoshopped! (opinion)
+ Here are some moon rocks (evidence)
- They were taken from a probe! (speculation)
+Then how did we get them to earth? (logic)
- Well, I don't even know that they are from the moon! (change of tactic)
+ Every scientist who examined them says that they are. (scholarly opinion)
- The scientists are in on the conspiracy! (desperation, which takes us back to the first step)
It never ends, because the hoax-believers, too often, have no perspective and do not seek one. It is a moving target. But not subject to the whims of conspiracy theorists are the thousands who worked on the project and the tens of thousands impacted by their work (family, friends, etc.).
So it jumps from 3 astronauts making it up, to a few dozen in on it, to thousands of contractors, to tens or hundreds of thousands of family members, neighbors and freinds, to the Russians and most everyone born in my era, and then pretty much everyone on the planet is part of the "conspiracy."
And for what?
For the ability to deny being "gullible?"
Reason is seductive-- let it seduce.
+ Every scientist who examined them says that they are. (scholarly opinion)
Originally posted by 000063
I went to the barber a month ago. I have not been back since. Did I go to the barber?
Originally posted by 11I11
Originally posted by ddaniel
Just found this site that shows new, high resolution (or at least the highest we have so far) pictures of foot tracks / rover tracks on the surface of the moon.
I suppose these are a hoax as well...
To be honest that picture isnt going to convince anyone in the hoax camp my friend. Personally I do not believe man landed on the moon. My reason?...... Just on the basis that the last time man apparently landed on the moon was 1972 and i cannot understand why we wouldnt have been back since.
You argument is invalid.