It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Frira
I was about to post a picture I took of Apollo 12 and 13, both inside the Vertical Assembly Building (where I got to inside and toured—you may bow, reverently ;-) ) but realized I would lose copyright by posting here.
Originally posted by patternfinder
Originally posted by Videot
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by patternfinder
How about you tell me what the "frequency" of 5MeV electrons is.
How about 40MeV protons?
I kinda hate to get in the middle of this(!), but doesn't the theory of wave/particle duality imply that all particles do indeed have a frequency? I vaguely remember an equation from college physics that relates the two, though not the details.
And of course, if string theory is correct (decidedly undecided at this time) everything is made up of oscillations.
well, phage is relying on the idea that a particle isn't a wave.....i am of the idea that a particle is made up of waves......that's where we are butting heads....
Originally posted by malcr
Originally posted by OccamAssassin
Excellent thread. S&F
I love to read about actual accounts of the Apollo missions from those who were there.
To those who think the moon landings were faked, you should really try and get some "first hand" accounts from people who actually lived through the 60's. The scale of people involved in both the USA and Australia is far to large to be able to fake such events. Surely someone would have come forward in the last 40 years with solid evidence if it had actually been a hoax. Instead we only have crackpot theories with no basis beyond wild speculation coming from people seek to capitalise on gullibility.edit on 5/9/2011 by OccamAssassin because: (no reason given)
I tend to agree about the scale of the conspiracy. However, unlike say the 9/11 conspiracy the moon one depends on a very very small number of people. The whole "truth" depends on a feed from 3 astronauts. So that's a fake feed from 3 astronauts plus however many people need to fake the feed. Not only that but all that is needed is a delayed feed from all the genuine instrumentation measuring genuine "actors" coupled with fake video!! Everyone else, the thousands downstrem are entirely dependant on the data coming from the Apollo craft. OK two feeds one from the command module and one from the lem.
So it is just possible but still requires a lot of faith from technicians at the time not double checking the data feeds.
Originally posted by Frira
reply to post by PsykoOps
I did add copyright data when uploading-- but have seen no way to include if someone decided to download it anyway-- not to mention that "other site" grabbing entire threads and posting them as anonymous (discussed on some threads here last week).